Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scale of Respect"
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
With like, 1 being blue and 10 being hot red, sorta like a thermometer but on the side. I have no idea how to do it in MS Paint (because I'm not 133t enough to use Photoshop and I suck at GIMP) but that would be a way to illustrate it with it still being factual. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 20:45, 24 June 2009 (CEST) | With like, 1 being blue and 10 being hot red, sorta like a thermometer but on the side. I have no idea how to do it in MS Paint (because I'm not 133t enough to use Photoshop and I suck at GIMP) but that would be a way to illustrate it with it still being factual. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 20:45, 24 June 2009 (CEST) | ||
*Finally thought of it - like the old "Hot or Not"? scale. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 22:43, 24 June 2009 (CEST) | *Finally thought of it - like the old "Hot or Not"? scale. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 22:43, 24 June 2009 (CEST) | ||
==Congratulations to CrassCrab== | |||
His section, though sounds a bit too much "analysis," relates Chris to psychological developments and thus doesn't totally suck. Perhaps cite these studies though and maybe retitle the section to something other than "The Concept."--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 08:54, 7 December 2009 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 03:54, 7 December 2009
Could someone make a drawing for this? Normally I wouldn't consider this worthy of an entire article but it's something fucked up Chris thought of to deal with social interactions that it's worthy to focus on. I think it could use a picture though. --Champthom 22:09, 8 June 2009 (CEST)
- I did a small table, showing what the Scale of Respect theoretically could look like. Everyone, please edit it if you think certain things are wrong. Also add people who I may have forgotten. In the end someone could whip out a decent looking graph in MS paint or whatever. It will be cool. RachmaninovDESU 20:24, 24 June 2009 (CEST)
- Fuck you, Champthom, with your funny but not factual. ^^ But srsly, if you wanted a picture, how would that suddenly be "factual"? Or were you just referring to a funny illustrative picture...
| Points | People who fall into this category |
|---|---|
| 10. Respect. | Christian Weston Chandler |
| 9. | God; Jesus |
| 8. | Barbara Chandler |
| 7. | Bob Chandler; The President of the United States |
| 6. | Gal-Pals; Family Members; Boyfriend-free girls |
| 5. | Buddies; Average Single Men |
| 4. | Non-Single Men |
| 3. | Jerkops; Manajerks |
| 2. | Mary Lee Walsh; Wes Iseli; Jason Kendrick Howell; ScotPallazo |
| 1. | Satan |
| 0. No respect. | Trolls; 4-cent Garbage Employees |
Check it out now. RachmaninovDESU 20:27, 24 June 2009 (CEST)
- I was thinking just a 1 to 10 point bar, like:
1 ───────────────────────────────── 10 (Respect)
No
Respect
With like, 1 being blue and 10 being hot red, sorta like a thermometer but on the side. I have no idea how to do it in MS Paint (because I'm not 133t enough to use Photoshop and I suck at GIMP) but that would be a way to illustrate it with it still being factual. --Champthom 20:45, 24 June 2009 (CEST)
- Finally thought of it - like the old "Hot or Not"? scale. --Champthom 22:43, 24 June 2009 (CEST)
Congratulations to CrassCrab
His section, though sounds a bit too much "analysis," relates Chris to psychological developments and thus doesn't totally suck. Perhaps cite these studies though and maybe retitle the section to something other than "The Concept."--Champthom 08:54, 7 December 2009 (CET)