Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vivian Gee"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:* That was actually cuntpasted from the original CWCki. Anyway, here's the sauce. [http://cogsdev.110mb.com/CWCki/index.php/Trolls/VivianG] --[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]] 02:26, 27 February 2009 (CET) | :* That was actually cuntpasted from the original CWCki. Anyway, here's the sauce. [http://cogsdev.110mb.com/CWCki/index.php/Trolls/VivianG] --[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]] 02:26, 27 February 2009 (CET) | ||
::* Yeah, but that's a wiki that anyone can edit... [[User:RachmaninovDESU|RachmaninovDESU]] 11:00, 27 February 2009 (CET) | ::* Yeah, but that's a wiki that anyone can edit... [[User:RachmaninovDESU|RachmaninovDESU]] 11:00, 27 February 2009 (CET) | ||
:::* True. Still, an interesting conclusion for that writer to come to nonetheless... --[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]] 13:30, 2 March 2009 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 07:30, 2 March 2009
From the original CWCki
What can be made of this:
"HOLY SHIT SPOILER ALERT CLYDE CASH AND VIVIAN G ARE THE SAME PERSON
Vivian Gee/Clyde Cash are two identities of a mysterious figure in Alaska who has been trolling CWC since at least August 2007 when the /v/ board of 4chan first found him. No one is sure of the true identity behind the legends, but one thing is certain: He/She is clearly insane as a result of such a lengthy tour of duty as the one he/she has put themselves through. Evidence of this is his/her recent inability to speak/type softly, much like BILLY MAYS! But we still love him/her regardless. "
--Anonymous 11:36, 16 February 2009 (CET)
- Maybe all the other trolls, and Chris are all one and the same person, and we're all trolling YOU! (No srsly, way to go claiming something without any citation ^^) RachmaninovDESU 20:22, 26 February 2009 (CET)
- That was actually cuntpasted from the original CWCki. Anyway, here's the sauce. [1] --Anonymous 02:26, 27 February 2009 (CET)
- Yeah, but that's a wiki that anyone can edit... RachmaninovDESU 11:00, 27 February 2009 (CET)
- True. Still, an interesting conclusion for that writer to come to nonetheless... --Anonymous 13:30, 2 March 2009 (CET)