Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ginger"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
:I think you did pretty good considering you only had one momentary shout-out to work with.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 19:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
:I think you did pretty good considering you only had one momentary shout-out to work with.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 19:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
::Thanks Beat. I have the feeling we will hear more about her later. [[User:Griffintown|Griffintown]] 20:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
::Thanks Beat. I have the feeling we will hear more about her later. [[User:Griffintown|Griffintown]] 20:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
:Griffintown, I am disappoint. By this logic, we should have an article for Kim (girl mentioned in at least one Chris video), Scarlet (Chris's friend who posted the videos), the hambeast (chick from [[Two's Company snapshots]]), Stephanie ([[Ivy|Ivy's]] friend), etc. There's nothing public about Ginger yet so this is all speculation and not encyclopedic.--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 21:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:53, 15 January 2010

This text is a test; Yes, No Shit Is Too Small but how can we manage the amazingly smallest piece of poop? This is my take. Griffintown 19:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

I think you did pretty good considering you only had one momentary shout-out to work with.--Beat 19:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Beat. I have the feeling we will hear more about her later. Griffintown 20:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Griffintown, I am disappoint. By this logic, we should have an article for Kim (girl mentioned in at least one Chris video), Scarlet (Chris's friend who posted the videos), the hambeast (chick from Two's Company snapshots), Stephanie (Ivy's friend), etc. There's nothing public about Ginger yet so this is all speculation and not encyclopedic.--Champthom 21:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)