Difference between revisions of "Talk:CWCki"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (6 revisions) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Simple question: does he know that there is a whole Wiki about his antics? - TheRapingDog | Simple question: does he know that there is a whole Wiki about his antics? - TheRapingDog | ||
*He's been told by white knights but apparently he doesn't know. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 20:47, 15 June 2009 (CEST) | *He's been told by white knights but apparently he doesn't know. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 20:47, 15 June 2009 (CEST) | ||
** Guess when he heard "CWCki" he assumed that they were talking about his Cwcipedia. - Aldrasio | |||
==Old CWCki== | ==Old CWCki== | ||
Revision as of 20:17, 1 March 2010
To Do
- History of CWCki (starting with the original)
- Creation of CWCki and its relevance
Does he know about this wiki?
Simple question: does he know that there is a whole Wiki about his antics? - TheRapingDog
- He's been told by white knights but apparently he doesn't know. --Champthom 20:47, 15 June 2009 (CEST)
- Guess when he heard "CWCki" he assumed that they were talking about his Cwcipedia. - Aldrasio
Old CWCki
Good Lord, someone went to the trouble of vandalizing it despite the fact it's several months old and no one uses it. --Champthom 08:45, 14 October 2009 (CEST)
- who cares, all the useful information has been moved over here anyway. since the wiki software it runs on wasn't meant to deal with vandalism, i'll just delete it. i have an archive of it anyway, i think. --cogsdev/vedsgoc 10:12, 14 October 2009 (CEST)
- Yeah, at first I was like save it for old time sakes but the old CWCki has outlived its purpose and not to mention it's not worth keeping it around with vandalism and shit. --Champthom 10:14, 14 October 2009 (CEST)