Difference between revisions of "User talk:Clydec"
(→We need to have a word: new section) |
|||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
*shut the fuck up, it's nothing to do with chris. it's about some stupid bitch who happened to get involved with some stupid faggot. [[User:Clydec|Clydec]] 02:07, 11 March 2010 (UTC) | *shut the fuck up, it's nothing to do with chris. it's about some stupid bitch who happened to get involved with some stupid faggot. [[User:Clydec|Clydec]] 02:07, 11 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Okay, so that whole page was fake? --[[User:Dan Dash|Dan Dash]] 02:15, 11 March 2010 (UTC) | *Okay, so that whole page was fake? --[[User:Dan Dash|Dan Dash]] 02:15, 11 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
== We need to have a word == | |||
You know where to go. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 08:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:39, 11 March 2010
Clyde, I must hand it to you, you have turned CWCki into a respectable looking wiki. I salute you. --Champthom 06:24, 11 March 2009 (CET)
For your work making CWCki like a respectable wiki, it's CWCki's highest honor (at least, that I've made up):
Order of the Pickle This user has performed selfless service above and beyond the call of duty for the glorious Motherland. |
Good work, Clyde, we salute you. --Champthom 04:36, 16 March 2009 (CET)
And good job blocking Grawp.--Champthom 16:49, 17 March 2009 (CET)
Miyamoto Saga
I added a page for the Miyamoto Saga e-mails. I normally don't feel comfortable personally involved in trolling to editing pages in regards to themselves but since you were personally involved in this, I feel you could clarify the context and dates and such of the e-mails in question. I believe you said you don't have the sent e-mails but I believe you could at least provide the context of Chris's responses. --Champthom 10:03, 23 March 2009 (CET)
- tell me which ones you want me to clarify and i'll attempt to do so and now i'm off to sleep almost Clydec 10:11, 23 March 2009 (CET)
- You don't have to do it right away, but just clarify what you asked that prompted the responses, the general timeframe of these e-mails (some are obvious, like the hackings that someone like myself could clarify, but others are somewhat subtle), how you agreed to reimburse him, stuff like that. Just take a look when you have the chance and add whatever necessary commentary from your point of view as Miyamoto. --Champthom 10:25, 23 March 2009 (CET)
Yo
Quick reflexes there on that "lock your door faggot". --Fuckingstupid 22:51, 1 October 2009 (CEST)
WHAT
you is alive?! but you are dead bro and were are fighting the evil boss. LStaley416 04:27, 15 October 2009 (CEST)
Future of trolling
I was wondering what your opinion was on the direction Chris-trolling is going. What do you think of the biography Xentrilus and his team are working on? Does trolling Chris sometimes cause him more good than harm, especially recently? (example: Jack Thaddeus tells Chris to get exercise in the recent phone call) Sorry if these are newfag questions, but I figured 95% of what you get must be "HEY WILL U BE MAH BRO??" and "IF U R DEAD THEN WHO WAS PHONE??" in which case I'd probably be safe. Anyways, thanks for reading my questions. --fabrosi 19:12, 17 December 2009 (CET)
chris-trolling is now pretty much: LET'S WATCH THE CWCIPEDIA AND LAUGH AT HIS ANSWERS, there's nothing. if you have something that isn't a boyfriend free girl blah. chris will forever be stressed out by gay ads no matter what jack says. also stop asking me stupid questions Clydec 21:13, 17 December 2009 (CET)
SEKRIT OPERATIONS
I was told you have a job for me on Asperpedia, I signed up. What do you need done with the images? --Fuckingstupid 20:23, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Operation Mailbag
Clyde, what's happening to that? It seems to have pretty much come to a halt. I guess it makes sense because there's now common questions, but I think the CWCki users should have some way of getting their questions posted (to improve articles and shed light on certain issues) - Will there be something like "Operation Common Questions"? --Wtv 14:03, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wallflower
Why no personal details? did you see tonight's video and you thought he would Budd Dwyer himself halfway through, I mean, WHAT THE FUCK? --Dan Dash 02:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- shut the fuck up, it's nothing to do with chris. it's about some stupid bitch who happened to get involved with some stupid faggot. Clydec 02:07, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, so that whole page was fake? --Dan Dash 02:15, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
We need to have a word
You know where to go. --Champthom 08:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)