Difference between revisions of "Talk:Field agents"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: The field agents aren't Miscreants and in theory, really shouldn't get their own article, mostly due to the nature of their work and because they're people in the field, they're more susce...) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The field agents aren't Miscreants and in theory, really shouldn't get their own article, mostly due to the nature of their work and because they're people in the field, they're more susceptible than random faggots like us who hide behind a monitor in safety. I'll consult them to see how they want it handled. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 21:00, 27 September 2009 (CEST) | The field agents aren't Miscreants and in theory, really shouldn't get their own article, mostly due to the nature of their work and because they're people in the field, they're more susceptible than random faggots like us who hide behind a monitor in safety. I'll consult them to see how they want it handled. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 21:00, 27 September 2009 (CEST) | ||
:*K... didn't really know where to direct this, trying to fix broken links really. Guess we can just delete it again. --[[User:Fuckingstupid|Fuckingstupid]] 23:00, 27 September 2009 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 16:00, 27 September 2009
The field agents aren't Miscreants and in theory, really shouldn't get their own article, mostly due to the nature of their work and because they're people in the field, they're more susceptible than random faggots like us who hide behind a monitor in safety. I'll consult them to see how they want it handled. --Champthom 21:00, 27 September 2009 (CEST)
- K... didn't really know where to direct this, trying to fix broken links really. Guess we can just delete it again. --Fuckingstupid 23:00, 27 September 2009 (CEST)