Difference between revisions of "File talk:Timeline.png"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
**<s>Today I will upload a new timeline to accomodate the Tito Saga. --[[User:Bystander|Bystander]] 15:05, 18 March 2010 (UTC)</s> | **<s>Today I will upload a new timeline to accomodate the Tito Saga. --[[User:Bystander|Bystander]] 15:05, 18 March 2010 (UTC)</s> | ||
***Done. --[[User:Bystander|Bystander]] 23:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | ***Done. --[[User:Bystander|Bystander]] 23:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
==Typography== | |||
I thought I'd never say this about anything ever but - the typography doesn't seem right for this. I don't know, I don't think it's right for a timeline about sagas, seems like a font I'd associate with a 20s jazz club or something like that. What do you guys think? It's still presented great and I appreciate Bystander's effort to update it, but I think that it looks off and can hinder accurately presenting the information given the medium. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 07:53, 6 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:53, 6 April 2010
Needs to be update to include Asperchu. --Champthom 07:08, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Added it and the CWCipedia Saga, I uploaded a new version 10 minutes ago, I don't know if it's up now. --Bystander 21:21, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Good job! I like it. --Jewlay 00:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Typography
I thought I'd never say this about anything ever but - the typography doesn't seem right for this. I don't know, I don't think it's right for a timeline about sagas, seems like a font I'd associate with a 20s jazz club or something like that. What do you guys think? It's still presented great and I appreciate Bystander's effort to update it, but I think that it looks off and can hinder accurately presenting the information given the medium. --Champthom 07:53, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
