Difference between revisions of "User talk:Clydec/CWC Facts"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I'm not trying to bust balls here, but you said that you do a 360 and walk away in that first line. Wouldn't it be a 180? 360 would be a full circle. Again, not trying to be a douche... just thought I'd let you know. --[[User:shearod|Shearod]] 22:53, 11 June 2010 (UTC) | I'm not trying to bust balls here, but you said that you do a 360 and walk away in that first line. Wouldn't it be a 180? 360 would be a full circle. Again, not trying to be a douche... just thought I'd let you know. --[[User:shearod|Shearod]] 22:53, 11 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Clearly, ''someone'' doesn't know their memes. Lurk moar.--[[User:MoarLurk|MoarLurk]] 23:22, 11 June 2010 (UTC) | *Clearly, ''someone'' doesn't know their memes. Lurk moar.--[[User:MoarLurk|MoarLurk]] 23:22, 11 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
**Whoops. My apologies... After a little "lurking", I found it. Boy is my face red. I guess I'm behind the curve on the memes - had never heard of that one. I = newfag. --[[User:Shearod|Shearod]] 07:05, 12 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:06, 12 June 2010
My problem with this
- Why do we need this? We have an FAQ, and if people want to do know the basics of Chris can consult his article as it conveys the same stuff conveyed here.
- No citations, and the credit card things are not based on publicly available information. Clyde, if have shit to share, you're going to have to release it.
Srsly Clyde, try harder next time. This could be improved but in the time being, but frankly I think this is really redundant and is already conveyed elsewhere. --Champthom 03:22, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm not trying to bust balls here, but you said that you do a 360 and walk away in that first line. Wouldn't it be a 180? 360 would be a full circle. Again, not trying to be a douche... just thought I'd let you know. --Shearod 22:53, 11 June 2010 (UTC)