Talk:Jackie E-mails 23

From CWCki
Revision as of 15:42, 16 December 2020 by Blue Bully (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Holy fuck, did I really do that for... 17 sets of e-mails? Well; spielcheck, grammar, links, and format, fellas, 'cause I'm tired and got a final in the morning.--Xavier orona 02:01, 3 December 2010 (PST)

I made a minor edit just to fix the benefits & blah blah blah. If no one likes it you guys can change it to whatever u guys like. ShinGokuIAM 10:40, 6 December 2010 (PST)

How repeatedly does Chris have to say something for it to be considered a CWCism? "Hurtful Truth Level" is sticking out at me as one of those times where he has to simplify an abstract concept into something quantifiable like a video game level in order for him to understand it. Draygoon 04:14, 2 January 2011 (PST)

I don't think it's an exact science. If you see it a lot, it's a good idea to compile the sources and either get someone else to make an article or make a sandbox page and start one. The CWCism pages don't require that many sources, if memory serves. Freecell 10:43, 2 January 2011 (PST)

So is all that about his duck true? Is it no longer bent? [[User:Blue Bully|Blue Bully 2:41 December 16 2020 (CST)

Retrieved from "http://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jackie_E-mails_23&oldid=256304"