Talk:Lesbian Sex Audition

From CWCki
Revision as of 14:33, 2 June 2016 by Researcher (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

End line

Did anyone catch the slip at the end of the video?

"Please have MY babies..." before he immediately corrects himself with "I mean, our babies".

This is classic Chris ego bullshit that I feel should be mentioned that, again, despite the fact that these women are essentially going to use him as genetic fodder and he will have no future contact with the child at all (probably the best thing anyone with Chris' genes can hope for), he still has to say that they're still HIS kids.

That fits perfectly with Chris, actually. You do all the work: having them, raising them, paying for them, but I take the credit and do all the fun stuff. Somehow I can imagine Chris constantly harassing them nonstop too, should it happen (God forbid), that they can't keep the kid away from him. Class. --The World Is Yours (talk) 22:17, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

 *Researcher here. Honestly, I believe Chris is going back to his pre-liquid chris self.

Yes we all know autists are egotistical, but you don't actually believe this is anything other than a troll right? Some brave soul milked him for a brand new love doll video. No one would actually procreate with Chris when they could just as easily hand any other person a hundred dollars and tell them to wank into a turkey baster.


The shit about the lesbian couple needs citation Res (talk) 14:07, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


When I wrote that all I had to go on was the video and the vague mention of the guy who challenged him. I'm thankful it was a troll setup from the start though; that no one would ever want Chris' genes for anything. What a relief. Still, such blatant egotism in that scenario where he's being essentially used, thinking he's doing the using. That should be documented. The very essence that is Chris. --The World Is Yours (talk) 14:38, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Should we add the tugboat template to the top of the page, because of the blow-up doll? Or no?