Talk:Mailbag 56

OH SHIT MIKE JACKSON JR.--Beat 05:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

There seems to be a slight inconsistency in Jr.'s letter. He says that Chris's canned response left his mother catatonic for DAYS...yet, said canned response was only delivered yesterday. Never mind, I get it. Chris probably won't get around to MB56 for a few more days anyway. So when he DOES eventually read Jr.'s message, the times will match up. That is...diabolically clever, assuming it was even intentional. Xentrilus 11:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

I wouldn't expect a response to MB56 for at least a couple of weeks. Liquid! 13:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Oh boy, Chris half-assed the response, I can't wait for Mike's reply.--MoarLurk 04:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Oh christ, now we know why Chris half-assed the Mike Jackson responses. "Michael Jackson..." Dammit, I can't believe I didn't catch that. Does this mean he's wising up to the mailbag references? Xentrilus 05:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Mike Jackson's pretty goddamn obvious. I don't think he initially caught it though. I'm pretty sure the first time he was actually referred to as "Michale" was in his grieving widow's letter, and that threw him off.--Beat 05:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

I figured it out. Chris doesn't read the actual names on his e-mails. That's why he only figures it out when they mention it in the body of the letter. That's why he gave the grieving widow the form letter. The Mike Jackson letters never really dwelled much on names except for simply "Mike." Then he gets this e-mail long after the others and goes "Why is woman e-mailing me about Michale Jackson?" --Beat 12:32, 20 February 2010 (UTC)