User talk:Briscoe/Chris and Reliability
Revision as of 01:31, 5 January 2010 by Griffintown (talk | contribs)
Thought this would be a good "Chris and..." page. It needs to be expanded and added to Template:Chris and -Cody 11:32 PM January 4th 2010
- I second this! The world needs to know exactly how unreliable he is. --CWCAttack 05:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- This is really starting to push it. Srsly, can you think of a better name than "Chris and x"? It's starting to be done to death. Also, can you elaborate what you're aiming for this page? --Champthom 05:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- It always makes me so warm when Champ gets irritated.... --Tristran 06:24, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with Champ; for one thing if all you can think of off the top of your head is one sentence, then maybe you should reconsider. For another, what can go in this page that can't go into some other, broader page? It's ridiculously specific. I like the idea of the "Chris and..." pages, since they give a good overview of Chris, but that's what they should be, an overview from which you can dig deeper, not treatises on specific personality traits (for which there probably isn't even enough for an article). --Sonichuis44 06:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- The page sounds like another shade of grey. Reliability is way to narrow for the "Chris and..." series. Griffintown 06:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC)