Talk:Red Letter CWC Certified Day

God I was hoping we wouldn't see Smug Chris so soon again. --Sack Thaddic 23:29, 12 November 2009 (CET)

Ugh, tell me about it. Although I'm kind of pleased the Liquid/Kacey saga is coming to a close, it felt like it had overstayed its welcome a little. The content it ended up producing was less HAHAHA OH MY GOD and more JESUS FUCKING CHRIST CHRIS WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU ;_;. But anyway, the higher the pedestal, the further the fall. Let's hope another PVCC troll plan knocks Chris down a few notches once again. xontrolos 23:35, 12 November 2009 (CET)

Pissed off, yelling chris is my favorite. --Dave 23:46, 12 November 2009 (CET)

"What Chris fails to realise is that he has only copyrighted the NAME."

Names are not copyrighted. You copyright concepts and works, you trademark names and logos (but can only register for those used in trade in 2 or more states). You technically have a copyright the moment you create something, but can register a copyright to make it easier to defend in court, as one of the Chrises has done here (idk which was responsible for it). --Mrpayback 17:49, 12 November 2009 (EST) oh god i am not good with wikis

Fix the article then. I not good with law businesses. HURRY before it's too late!! xontrolos 23:52, 12 November 2009 (CET)

I barely even know how to use a discussion page, bro. THIS IS TOO MUCH RESPONSIBILITY OH GOD Mrpayback 23:56, 12 November 2009 (CET)

OK, don't worry, I've removed some of the offending terms. What is up currently ought to be more accurate. If I should make any more changes, please let me know. xontrolos 23:59, 12 November 2009 (CET)

So, if he copyrighted the concept of "Sonic+Pikachu", is that something Nintendo and Sega would be able to shut down? Because I'm itching to send them a letter about this. BananaKid 23:57, 12 November 2009 (CET)

Go right ahead. Several people have already attempted to get in contact with Nintendo and Sega, so the more the better. And it would be fantastic to see Sega, the company Chris has loved for so long, shit all over his face. xontrolos 23:59, 12 November 2009 (CET)

Well uh, basically copyright infringement involves things that are confusingly similar, to the point where someone not familiar with the subject could easily mistake the infringing concept with the original. Also, it generally has to be in the same industry. Since there were Sonic the Hedgehog comics and Sonichu is indistinguishable from him aside from color, I guess you could make that case (though I don't think anyone could mistake Sonichu for Pikachu), but Sega would have to file it on their own. idk if it'd be treated as an international copyright violation, since the copyright (and trademarks) of Sonic are owned by Sega of Japan, but that would be hilarious since it immediately goes to federal court for that and costs everyone involved tons of money. Mrpayback 00:02, 13 November 2009 (CET)