Difference between revisions of "Talk:2014 anonymous sweetheart"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "A couple of comments: *There's still some Facebook material pertaining to this article that has not been transcribed yet to the CWCki. I'm going to take care of that soon. *I...")
 
m
Line 2: Line 2:


*There's still some Facebook material pertaining to this article that has not been transcribed yet to the CWCki. I'm going to take care of that soon.
*There's still some Facebook material pertaining to this article that has not been transcribed yet to the CWCki. I'm going to take care of that soon.
*I don't particularly like the name I gave this article because it's not really catchy, but I can't think of anything better. If anyone can come up with a catchy name that also gives the reader an idea on what this article is about feel free to propose it.
*I don't particularly like the name I gave this article because it's not really catchy, but I can't think of anything better. If anyone can come up with a catchy name that also gives the reader an idea of what this article is about feel free to propose it.
*I'm wondering if we should an add a sentence a two about her likely motives for being in contact with Chris. A troll or a Wallflower-like situation are the most likely possibilites (in that order), but I'm not sure if the article should say that as it does not directly seen from the evidence we currently have.  
*I'm wondering if we should an add a sentence a two about her likely motives for being in contact with Chris. A troll or a Wallflower-like situation are the most likely possibilites (in that order), but I'm not sure if the article should say that as it is not directly seen from the evidence we currently have.  


Thoughts? - [[User:NegaCWC|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC|talk]]) 22:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Thoughts? - [[User:NegaCWC|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC|talk]]) 22:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:54, 10 September 2014

A couple of comments:

  • There's still some Facebook material pertaining to this article that has not been transcribed yet to the CWCki. I'm going to take care of that soon.
  • I don't particularly like the name I gave this article because it's not really catchy, but I can't think of anything better. If anyone can come up with a catchy name that also gives the reader an idea of what this article is about feel free to propose it.
  • I'm wondering if we should an add a sentence a two about her likely motives for being in contact with Chris. A troll or a Wallflower-like situation are the most likely possibilites (in that order), but I'm not sure if the article should say that as it is not directly seen from the evidence we currently have.

Thoughts? - NegaCWC (talk) 22:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)