Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chris and negotiation"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:*Champthom, much like [[User:Beat|some other people]] is always right. --[[User:Ronichu|Ronichu]] 16:51, 3 September 2010 (PDT) | :*Champthom, much like [[User:Beat|some other people]] is always right. --[[User:Ronichu|Ronichu]] 16:51, 3 September 2010 (PDT) | ||
:It might fit better in [[Chris and his Ego]] under Manifestations. --[[User:Xanabit|Xanabit]] 16:57, 3 September 2010 (PDT) | :It might fit better in [[Chris and his Ego]] under Manifestations. --[[User:Xanabit|Xanabit]] 16:57, 3 September 2010 (PDT) | ||
Actually this page came as a request from yoko after this last saga, I was going to put it together myself, after a bit more of the events recent events are made "public", but I see someone's jumped the gun and started it without me. There's plenty of material that can go into the article that has it's own merit, mostly involving the frustrations many trolls experience in manipulating the 2010 era Chris, who cares only for his PS3. I'll see what I can do to improve the article with some REDACTED materials, but yeah, this article is a special request, so we should improve it rather than throw it out. --[[User:Megaman|Megaman]] 17:12, 3 September 2010 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 20:12, 3 September 2010
Deletion
I really think there's not enough basis for this page. This is a really interesting topic but not really something encyclopedic and this really comes off as more of an essay sort of deal. I think a lot of this can be summarized in one sentence in autism that "Chris is incapable of seeing other people's point of view." Thoughts?--Champthom 16:36, 3 September 2010 (PDT)
- Champthom, much like some other people is always right. --Ronichu 16:51, 3 September 2010 (PDT)
- It might fit better in Chris and his Ego under Manifestations. --Xanabit 16:57, 3 September 2010 (PDT)
Actually this page came as a request from yoko after this last saga, I was going to put it together myself, after a bit more of the events recent events are made "public", but I see someone's jumped the gun and started it without me. There's plenty of material that can go into the article that has it's own merit, mostly involving the frustrations many trolls experience in manipulating the 2010 era Chris, who cares only for his PS3. I'll see what I can do to improve the article with some REDACTED materials, but yeah, this article is a special request, so we should improve it rather than throw it out. --Megaman 17:12, 3 September 2010 (PDT)