User talk:Delabonte

At least you get the joke. YOUR AN HERO TO ME, DELABONTE! --Champthom 06:34, 2 May 2009 (CEST)

Oh lol, my bad. Was in grammar nazi mode, fixing typos. --Jump 16:10, 2 May 2009 (CEST)

Congratulations!

You were mentioned in the new video. Nice. --Champthom 22:48, 17 July 2009 (CEST)

• Thanks. This calls for a box to go on my userpage. --Delabonte 04:59, 18 July 2009 (CEST)

• Oh Lord, I just your pro tip on your user page and I LOL'd. --Champthom 16:33, 9 September 2009 (CEST)

Lovely Weather

"Sex under false pretence IS statutory rape. Also saying Chris raped his future wife is funnier."

I'm not going to sit here and have an edit war with you, but I believe you are mistaken, Mr. ex-Minister. I can find no evidence of sex under false pretense being considered rape of any kind. It certainly is sexual assault, but I can't find any legitimate site that claims it to be rape (aside from random postings of failtowns on forums). Unless you can provide some evidence, I'd say that you're simply wrong about that.

On top of that, you're right in saying that it's "funnier" to say that he raped her, but that's not the point. We're supposed to document what actually happened/was implied. We don't need to make up things to make Chris look like more of a douche; he does that for us enough as it is. --Tristran 04:15, 11 December 2009 (CET)

• You're... You're kidding, right? If she doesn't know who he is, and thinks he is someone else, she cannot give consent. Sex without consent is rape. You're pretty gross for arguing that's not what happened, because it totally is. --sonichuis44 04:26, 11 December 2009 (CET)

• She thinks she knows who he is, though. He deceived her and got her to willingly consent to sex with him. That's not rape. It's sexual assault. --Tristran 04:30, 11 December 2009 (CET)
• Every weekend, I'm over at a singles' bar in the area. I always lie out of my ass just to get laid. One week I'm an airplane pilot, the other I'm a venture capitalist, one day I was even a comic book artist. And now you're telling me I'm a rapist? --Lynxr 04:46, 11 December 2009 (CET)

• Of course she thinks she does; that's part of the deception. Look, if I dress up like Jimmy Hill and go over to your house and you go "Oh God, Jimmy Hill!" then tear off my clothes and go down on me (cause u gay like that), then I rip off my mask after jizzing on your face and go "Surprise! I'm really Internet Comedian SonichuIs44!" I've raped you. You consented to sex with Jimmy Hill, not with me. Even if I never reveal I'm not Jimmy Hill, I've raped you; you never consented to sex with me. You could at least try arguing it's not rape based on the fact that she's having sex with Chris either way. And pray tell what is the difference between rape and sexual assault?

Lynxr, you're not telling them that you're someone else though; if you convinced them you're really Tom Hanks, but you're not (I'll assume you're not), you've deceived them. --sonichuis44 04:48, 11 December 2009 (CET)

"It certainly is sexual assault" - what do you think rape is? Time-travel sexual assault laws have yet to be tested, but from where I stand if you have sex with someone knowingly under false pretense, then it's not fully consensual. Also, this is the CWCki not the supreme court. And saying Chris travelled through time to rape his future wife is still funnier. --Delabonte 04:53, 11 December 2009 (CET)

• You both have a interesting definitions of consent. What you're saying is that it isn't consent unless she knows the full truth. That's... horribly illogical and simply untrue. Now, specifically for Sonichuis44, the difference between rape and sexual assault is that rape is entirely forced and without consent (or in some cases of statutory rape, simply consensual sex with a minor). Chris has consent in this case, whether you want to admit that or not. She willingly did it with him, and not under threats or force (unless there's something he's not telling us about this fictional story that he, himself, made up in the first place). It's as simple as that. Maybe what he did violated her, maybe she really wouldn't care all that much if she knew the truth, but it doesn't really matter, but it seems pretty obvious that she agreed to it. Back to the point, though, rape is a subset of sexual assault. Sexual assault involves undesired sexual contact, but it might not involve intercourse in any way (such as sexual touching), or, even if it does... well... that's relative to who's making the rules in whatever jurisdiction. Some things that are generally considered sexual assault in most places are mitigated to full-blown rape status in other places and vice versa. I don't really care to get too into that, but the fact of the matter is that he had her consent, and that's what's relevant here. However, I'm done arguing about this fictional story. Further arguing about a sexual encounter that never happened, nor ever could (as time-travel like that is, from a logical standpoint, absolutely impossible), seems ridiculous. --Tristran 05:17, 11 December 2009 (CET)

• Don't bring logic into this. Also, Chris agrees with you: "You are misunderstood, it was not rape; She mistook me for my future self, and She Asked Me to have sex with her.". This means you are wrong. Good day sir. --Delabonte 05:31, 11 December 2009 (CET)

• We may have had a tense discussion, and you may well have been a piss-poor Minister of Defense, but... I've decided that I like you, Seinor Delabonte. Your lulziness rating qualifies you for the much-coveted Badge of Lulziness and All-Around Goodness, which you may apply for by filling out the form that will be mailed to you shortly. Please allow blah blah blah blah. Good day. --Tristran 06:54, 11 December 2009 (CET)