Difference between revisions of "User talk:Liquid!"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<nowiki>*drops help bomb*</nowiki> "That's how ya do it, son." *soars away as you blow up* [[User:Llort|Llort]] 22:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | <nowiki>*drops help bomb*</nowiki> "That's how ya do it, son." *soars away as you blow up* [[User:Llort|Llort]] 22:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Thanks! - [[User:Liquid!|Liquid!]] 00:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | *Thanks! - [[User:Liquid!|Liquid!]] 00:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:*Thanks for updating the image of the now. I don't always have the energy from DA STRESS to update it, so it's good you've effectively updated it. In fact, you should do it more often. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 03:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
:**That's the plan. Not sure how good I am at capturing the Zeitgeist, but I'll do what I can. - [[User:Liquid!|Liquid!]] 00:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
**Holy Shit, you're British? You do a damn good impression for a limey prod, you should do voice acting. --[[User:Dan Dash|Dan Dash]] 16:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
***LOL! That's not me. I don't think Liquid Chris is on the CWCki. I do have delightful dulcet tones, though. - [[User:Liquid!|Liquid!]] 17:33, 6 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:33, 6 March 2010
The Incredible Lioness
*drops help bomb* "That's how ya do it, son." *soars away as you blow up* Llort 22:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! - Liquid! 00:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for updating the image of the now. I don't always have the energy from DA STRESS to update it, so it's good you've effectively updated it. In fact, you should do it more often. --Champthom 03:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- That's the plan. Not sure how good I am at capturing the Zeitgeist, but I'll do what I can. - Liquid! 00:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for updating the image of the now. I don't always have the energy from DA STRESS to update it, so it's good you've effectively updated it. In fact, you should do it more often. --Champthom 03:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)