Talk:GameStop Chloe Information
Accuracy
“ |
When my friend checked in later, she was still working there. As luck would have it, all nearby Gamestops had no open positions, so she was screwed. At this point in time, the fucktards at ED had given Chris the $400 Gamestop giftcard, so he was going there on a daily basis buying $1 items just so he could stalk Chloe. |
” |
The problem with this that Chris didn't his card until January (from an IRC chat from 16 December 2008):
“ |
01:51 <@vivitheg> What have you spent your $400 giftcard on? |
” |
It's possible there is truth in this, but I don't think this is not an accurate source to site. Still, keep putting this stuff here, especially with chats with historic moments, such as the first mention of Chloe. --Champthom 06:53, 11 February 2009 (CET)
- Well, Chris did mention "Chloe" in videos before he entered the competition, so the part about him stalkign her beforehand could be true, the part of him owning the card then could be "enhanced", that or he had previously bought one.--UncleBastard 14:44, 11 February 2009 (CET)
- I can completely believe that Chris would constantly be spending money at GameStop and talking about the gift card weeks before he actually received the damn thing. The writer of this account might have put two and two together and assumed Chris already had the card. In any case, I'm fairly certain there is a real Chloe, or at least a real female cashier at GameStop that he had the hots for, since he alluded to this in his PS3 history video. --MachPunch 07:26, 4 March 2009 (CET)
- There is some truth there as liars rarely can make consistent explanations, especially if they're autistic.--UncleBastard 09:31, 4 March 2009 (CET)
- But There was obviously a girl there, Chloe could have been her name, oe what he overheard in a conversation with someone else or read on her nametag and he fantasised about her. But I used to work in EB and got pretty pissed whenever customers demanded my name, so she wouldn't have given it out lightly otherwise, especially to a freak.--UncleBastard 09:30, 4 March 2009 (CET)