Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Christory"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
*I know that something unimportant like the mailbag can be ignored can be ignored, but what what about just uploading a video or starting/finishing an issue of Sonichu?  Example: 24 December 2009: Chris makes 2 videos, one to the Columbine shooters and the other with him playing legos.  This sounds noteworthy.  However, 7 December 2009: Chris finishes Sonichu 9.  Is that noteworthy?  --[[User:Caboose -1|Caboose -1]] 21:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
*I know that something unimportant like the mailbag can be ignored can be ignored, but what what about just uploading a video or starting/finishing an issue of Sonichu?  Example: 24 December 2009: Chris makes 2 videos, one to the Columbine shooters and the other with him playing legos.  This sounds noteworthy.  However, 7 December 2009: Chris finishes Sonichu 9.  Is that noteworthy?  --[[User:Caboose -1|Caboose -1]] 21:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
:*P.S. What about the phone calls as well?  I think the Alec Benson Leary phone calls were pretty revealing.  --[[User:Caboose -1|Caboose -1]] 21:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
:*P.S. What about the phone calls as well?  I think the Alec Benson Leary phone calls were pretty revealing.  --[[User:Caboose -1|Caboose -1]] 21:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
* As I said, make a double entry. But anyway, it seems that all pages that could be bluetexted are pretty much bluetexted. This was a great effort, and I want to thank everyone who chipped in, I'm very proud of you guys. [[User:RachmaninovDESU|RachmaninovDESU]] 14:48, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
==Bluetexting Complete==
I decided to try to fill in the last few dates that were still blank.  As it turns out, there were significant events on some of them, although I had to dig around to find them.  I wasn't sure how to edit the Usage Notes for the Template to reflect the change in status.  I think it should read something like "feel free to add new events where appropriate", but I wanted to make sure that's actually the next phase. [[User:Dethchemist77|Dethchemist77]] 14:41, 19 November 2010 (PST)

Latest revision as of 17:41, 19 November 2010

Date format

Some of the day pages' names don't match up with the rest, eg. "May 1" as opposed to the correct "May 01", or "April16" as opposed to "April 16". Is this going to cause problems with the frontpage module's day-to-day progression? if so the offending pages will need moving. Xentrilus 13:09, 8 November 2009 (CET)

Old question is old, but for the record the pages that don't follow the correct date format won't work. I've tagged misnamed templates for deletion. --Anonymax 18:41, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

General style suggestion

I think we should opt, whenever possible, to dig back and find events from Chris's childhood and adolescence over more recent events. Of course, we can't do this for every day of the year so it's perfectly acceptable to use a more recent events, but I think we should give some insight into Chris's past because it's an easy thing that people miss. --Champthom 20:35, 10 November 2009 (CET)

  • I tend to do this when bluetexting a month, but you need to be a bit carefull. Sometimes there are really important recent events that are worth celebrating that overshadow less important past events. You can always opt for the two-entry solution (check out the March 17 template). RachmaninovDESU 07:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I know that something unimportant like the mailbag can be ignored can be ignored, but what what about just uploading a video or starting/finishing an issue of Sonichu? Example: 24 December 2009: Chris makes 2 videos, one to the Columbine shooters and the other with him playing legos. This sounds noteworthy. However, 7 December 2009: Chris finishes Sonichu 9. Is that noteworthy? --Caboose -1 21:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
  • P.S. What about the phone calls as well? I think the Alec Benson Leary phone calls were pretty revealing. --Caboose -1 21:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
  • As I said, make a double entry. But anyway, it seems that all pages that could be bluetexted are pretty much bluetexted. This was a great effort, and I want to thank everyone who chipped in, I'm very proud of you guys. RachmaninovDESU 14:48, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Bluetexting Complete

I decided to try to fill in the last few dates that were still blank. As it turns out, there were significant events on some of them, although I had to dig around to find them. I wasn't sure how to edit the Usage Notes for the Template to reflect the change in status. I think it should read something like "feel free to add new events where appropriate", but I wanted to make sure that's actually the next phase. Dethchemist77 14:41, 19 November 2010 (PST)