User talk:Dethchemist77

From CWCki
Jump to: navigation, search

Gotta say,

You handled Episode 19 nicely. I was wondering how you were going to deal with the fucked up montage and "vision" sequence. The anus comment made me shit bricks. Now you gotta do 20 lol. --Jump 23:24, 10 August 2009 (CEST)

Asperchu

I saw your Asperchu audiobook, and I think you did an excellent job with that. I was wondering if you plan on doing any more in the future? --Edward 00:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

christmas

Are you and vivian ever going to do whate chris left of episode 11?

P.S: You and Vivitheg are fucking awesome!!! And i'm planning on making a TVtropes page on the audiobooks but wish for your previous consent.J0haely 04:04, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Welcome back my friend.

good to see you back. -- Clyde 00:13, 15 November 2010 (PST)

Deletion categ

The deletion category is a hidden one, and the {{delete}} (Usage) template will add it to articles automagically. You can adjust your preferences to show hidden categories - see Special:Preferences and look at the Appearance tab. --Anonymax 19:59, 19 November 2010 (PST)

Ah, I found it. That should help. Thanks.


Can you read some cwcville library pms?

The Cwcville Library through out it's creation has been getting tons of private messages from people who were retarded to think that the channel was actually chris' youtube profile. The archive channel has alot of fail troll attempts, gal pal proposals and possibly failed white knight attempts. Please respond if you're available to do this or not.If we could talk about this on your youtube or something, that'd be appreciatedSurfShackTito 11:53, 21 November 2010 (PST)

Sounds like fun. Do you want me to PM the Cwcville Library channel or a different one? Dethchemist77 13:04, 21 November 2010 (PST)
  • pm the cwcville library, i'll get her to send you the pms. SurfShackTito 13:42, 21 November 2010 (PST)

Documentation

Absolutely super work on adding documentation o_O. I personally dislike the documentation template, it should be burned, because it's hella ugly. {{usage}} (Usage) is a far nicer way to add usage instructions to templates. Please don't add a bunch of empty documentation templates - it's really quite pointless. --Anonymax 21:33, 26 November 2010 (PST)

  • About halfway into trying to categorize templates on the Special Pages, I realized I was doing it wrong and had to clean up my mess. Creating doc pages was the first solution I came across. Eventually, I plan on reviewing the templates category as a whole to clear any dead wood, so if you want the /doc pages removed, I can work on that while I'm at it. Dethchemist77 21:46, 26 November 2010 (PST)
What I realised a while ago is that a lot of templates are pretty basic and are simple to explain - so having a giant doc box and subpage for documentation was largely unnecessary. Some templates simply don't need explaining - but adding one or two lines under a usage template could work. Would definitely like to see the documentation template phased out though, so if you are working in those realms - that would be good. --Anonymax 22:44, 26 November 2010 (PST)

HEY READ THIS DETH PLZ

If you need any mass text replaced for example change Template:STUPID to Template:SUPERDUMB i can make it happen. by hijacking the admin controls. -- Clyde 22:37, 6 December 2010 (PST)

  • That would save me a lot of time, yeah. The only trick is that I'm not sure which set of templates needs to stay or go. Anonymax seems to prefer Template:Email (all the Jackie E-Mail pages use it), and I had just assumed Quotebox was the preferred template, because it had been around longer. It's not a case where Template: Email got used like three times, so it's not as cut and dried as I thought. Dethchemist77 11:17, 7 December 2010 (PST)


You are the silliest narrator ever!

Your voice is nice and clear like LiquidPlumr! You are probably one of the best narrators on the planet (next to Morgan Freeman). -- TheIronFjord 12:48, 27 January 2011 (EST)

A proposition

I have a unique opportunity just for you to contribute to the CWCki. If you're interested, contact me (my info is on my user page). --Champthom 15:31, 8 February 2011 (PST)