Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Stub"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Thoughts? --[[User:Great Briton|Great Briton]] 21:28, 29 July 2009 (CEST) | Thoughts? --[[User:Great Briton|Great Briton]] 21:28, 29 July 2009 (CEST) | ||
*Clever, but I think most people try to clear their head of the image of Chris's crotch, even if it is censored. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 00:06, 30 July 2009 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 17:06, 29 July 2009
Proposed new stub template
I don't think the current stub template's all that great. It just says the article sucks, when instead it should convey an article's brevity. There can be stubs that don't suck, and long articles that do suck, so they're two different things. Anyway, I quickly gimped an image and knocked up a possible new template, see below.
Thoughts? --Great Briton 21:28, 29 July 2009 (CEST)
- Clever, but I think most people try to clear their head of the image of Chris's crotch, even if it is censored. --Champthom 00:06, 30 July 2009 (CEST)