Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pmurt"
(→Pmurt saga: new section) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Should the Pmurt article be made into the Article of the Now?[[User:Hurtful Truth Level|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level|talk]]) 12:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC) | Should the Pmurt article be made into the Article of the Now?[[User:Hurtful Truth Level|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level|talk]]) 12:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC) | ||
== Pmurt saga == | |||
Should we go ahead and declare the Pmurt saga? Adam Stackhouse has a saga, and there's already more content about Pmurt. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level|talk]]) 22:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:30, 13 November 2016
Chris and President Trump
I know this isn't the most appropriate place to talk about this--but damn, I hope Chris goes ape shit over the election results. In all likeliness, he'll probably just let out a few stress sighs and then completely move on.--Galilean (talk) 07:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
You got your wish! Chris really went off the deep end there. Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 09:59, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
You got that right Hurtful. Like, HOLY SHIT. I'm pretty sure making a DEATH THREAT to the PRESIDENT-ELECT of the U.S. would land Chris into serious trouble (I know that making such a threat to the current President is a class E felony, not so sure about the President-Elect, but thinking it's the same deal). --Windows OS (talk) 01:31, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
I agree. Here's the full legal code for threats against a President-elect - it's covered under the same section as threats to the President, so probably a class E as well.
Should the Pmurt article be made into the Article of the Now?Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 12:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Pmurt saga
Should we go ahead and declare the Pmurt saga? Adam Stackhouse has a saga, and there's already more content about Pmurt. Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 22:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)