Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pmurt"
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*There is of course, another possibility... Chris may have found a new crutch--something to blame all the failings of his life on. The next time Chris complains about his financial situation, or being "discriminated against", he likely could push all culpability to President Donald Trump. In which case, we might be witnessing the beginning of a new magnitude of Chris sidestepping personal responsibility--then again, his attention span is really short. Only time will tell. | *There is of course, another possibility... Chris may have found a new crutch--something to blame all the failings of his life on. The next time Chris complains about his financial situation, or being "discriminated against", he likely could push all culpability to President Donald Trump. In which case, we might be witnessing the beginning of a new magnitude of Chris sidestepping personal responsibility--then again, his attention span is really short. Only time will tell. | ||
*My position is that we should wait until Trump's inauguration.--[[User:Galilean|Galilean]] ([[User talk:Galilean|talk]]) 23:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC) | *My position is that we should wait until Trump's inauguration.--[[User:Galilean|Galilean]] ([[User talk:Galilean|talk]]) 23:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC) | ||
Alright. His hatred of Pmurt has been simmering for a while, though. He's made anti-Pmurt videos since September and he's publicly supported Clinton since February. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level|talk]]) 01:45, 14 November 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:45, 13 November 2016
Chris and President Trump
I know this isn't the most appropriate place to talk about this--but damn, I hope Chris goes ape shit over the election results. In all likeliness, he'll probably just let out a few stress sighs and then completely move on.--Galilean (talk) 07:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
You got your wish! Chris really went off the deep end there. Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 09:59, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
You got that right Hurtful. Like, HOLY SHIT. I'm pretty sure making a DEATH THREAT to the PRESIDENT-ELECT of the U.S. would land Chris into serious trouble (I know that making such a threat to the current President is a class E felony, not so sure about the President-Elect, but thinking it's the same deal). --Windows OS (talk) 01:31, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
I agree. Here's the full legal code for threats against a President-elect - it's covered under the same section as threats to the President, so probably a class E as well.
Should the Pmurt article be made into the Article of the Now?Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 12:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Pmurt saga
Should we go ahead and declare the Pmurt saga? Adam Stackhouse has a saga, and there's already more content about Pmurt. Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 22:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Right now, I'm apprehensive about declaring this a Pmurt Saga. If his outbursts ended here, I'd say this doesn't deserve such a title. It's nearly impossible to accurately predict how Chris will react-- but I'm still under the impression that Chris will soon neglect all the politics and resume his miserable life--not that he stepped out of it at all.
- There is of course, another possibility... Chris may have found a new crutch--something to blame all the failings of his life on. The next time Chris complains about his financial situation, or being "discriminated against", he likely could push all culpability to President Donald Trump. In which case, we might be witnessing the beginning of a new magnitude of Chris sidestepping personal responsibility--then again, his attention span is really short. Only time will tell.
- My position is that we should wait until Trump's inauguration.--Galilean (talk) 23:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Alright. His hatred of Pmurt has been simmering for a while, though. He's made anti-Pmurt videos since September and he's publicly supported Clinton since February. Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 01:45, 14 November 2016 (UTC)