Difference between revisions of "Talk:2014 house fire"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Hurtful Truth Level moved page Talk:Destruction Of Chris's House to Talk:2014 house fire)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:


Why is this linked to the Facebook category? It has nothing more to do with Facebook than any other issue in Chris's life, seeing as how he eventually talks about everything on his Facebook page.  -asperhes, 1/2/15
Why is this linked to the Facebook category? It has nothing more to do with Facebook than any other issue in Chris's life, seeing as how he eventually talks about everything on his Facebook page.  -asperhes, 1/2/15
== Care package ==
[[Anna McLerran]]'s page states that ''after [the] house burned down, [...] the denizens of the CWCki Forums were putting together a care package for Chris''. I think this is a tremendously important part of the troll relationship with Chris and adds a lot to the point that there are general good intentions behind all the doxxing going on (thought that is hardly a decided fact). This is why I think this page absolutely needs to cover this part of the fire incident. I'm also curious myself to know if it ultimately went through or not and how much and what was planned to be given off as help.
I made a quick search on Google but found nothing concrete on the subject. I'm sure many of you can reach that information in seconds so please edit this article or send the info to my talk page so I can edit it myself. I've also put a "citation needed" thing on Anna's page, in case someone sees it and feels like adding a reference there at least.
[[User:Kek|Kek]] ([[User talk:Kek|talk]]) 13:28, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
== Rename ==
Maybe this could be renamed to something more accurate, like [[2014 house fire]]. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level|talk]]) 07:20, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
:'''Agree''': I suspect the title was selected at the time when it was unclear whether the house would be renovated or written off: obviously, the former occurred. --[[User:Little Owl|Little Owl]] ([[User talk:Little Owl|talk]]) 23:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
::Yeah I would say to just rename it. The current name implies that the house was permanently destroyed, which it obviously was not. [[User:Lez|Lez]] ([[User talk:Lez|talk]]) 02:53, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:39, 3 June 2021

Where is this alleged e-mail of Chris being allowed back in to get things? Where is this alleged e-mail of Chris saying fire fighters stole his mom's purse? Theiselybros 17:32, 25 January 2014 (PST)

What does this have to do with Facebook?

Why is this linked to the Facebook category? It has nothing more to do with Facebook than any other issue in Chris's life, seeing as how he eventually talks about everything on his Facebook page. -asperhes, 1/2/15

Care package

Anna McLerran's page states that after [the] house burned down, [...] the denizens of the CWCki Forums were putting together a care package for Chris. I think this is a tremendously important part of the troll relationship with Chris and adds a lot to the point that there are general good intentions behind all the doxxing going on (thought that is hardly a decided fact). This is why I think this page absolutely needs to cover this part of the fire incident. I'm also curious myself to know if it ultimately went through or not and how much and what was planned to be given off as help.

I made a quick search on Google but found nothing concrete on the subject. I'm sure many of you can reach that information in seconds so please edit this article or send the info to my talk page so I can edit it myself. I've also put a "citation needed" thing on Anna's page, in case someone sees it and feels like adding a reference there at least.

Kek (talk) 13:28, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Rename

Maybe this could be renamed to something more accurate, like 2014 house fire. Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 07:20, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Agree: I suspect the title was selected at the time when it was unclear whether the house would be renovated or written off: obviously, the former occurred. --Little Owl (talk) 23:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Yeah I would say to just rename it. The current name implies that the house was permanently destroyed, which it obviously was not. Lez (talk) 02:53, 4 June 2021 (UTC)