Difference between revisions of "User:PsychoNerd054/Logic"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
===Appeal to Authority=== | ===Appeal to Authority=== | ||
'''Appeal to Authority''' (sometimes referred to as '''Argument from Authority''') is when someone fallaciously uses an authority figure, regardless of their credibility or credentials, as support for their arguement. | '''Appeal to Authority''' (sometimes referred to as '''Argument from Authority''') is when someone fallaciously uses an authority figure, regardless of their credibility or credentials, as support for their arguement. | ||
===Bothsiderism=== | |||
{{Notes}} | {{Notes}} | ||
{{References}} | {{References}} | ||
Revision as of 13:49, 11 May 2025
| Back To Personal Library |
Essentials
Logical Fallacies
Ad Hominem
Ad Homniem (Latin for to the person) generally refers to making an argument based on one's character rather than their opinions or statements.[1] [2] Contrary to how the fallacy is usually understood, this isn't merely calling someone names or insulting them. It also doesn't necessary have to include these actions and actually comes in many different varieties. These include: Tu quoque, Guilt by Association, and Bulverism.
Given the type of community that surrounds Chris, one that mostly comprises of gossip and being critical of others, you are bound to find this fallacy pop up A LOT. Therefore, when making changes on this wiki, it is especially crucial to spot it when someone makes a claim about Chris or any of his orbiters.
Appeal to Authority
Appeal to Authority (sometimes referred to as Argument from Authority) is when someone fallaciously uses an authority figure, regardless of their credibility or credentials, as support for their arguement.