Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rosechu (species)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: It might be profitable to make a template for the Rosechu species, like all the various Rosechus. Srsly. --~~~~) |
m (2 revisions) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It might be profitable to make a template for the Rosechu species, like all the various Rosechus. Srsly. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 02:59, 24 June 2009 (CEST) | It might be profitable to make a template for the Rosechu species, like all the various Rosechus. Srsly. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 02:59, 24 June 2009 (CEST) | ||
*It's a good idea, but first I want to know if we should merge the rosechu (species) an the sonichu (species) articel, as they are pretty much the same species, but just different genders. (It's like how bulls and cows are both cattle, I guess...) Any thoughts? [[User:RachmaninovDESU|RachmaninovDESU]] 05:39, 3 November 2009 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:49, 3 January 2010
It might be profitable to make a template for the Rosechu species, like all the various Rosechus. Srsly. --Champthom 02:59, 24 June 2009 (CEST)
- It's a good idea, but first I want to know if we should merge the rosechu (species) an the sonichu (species) articel, as they are pretty much the same species, but just different genders. (It's like how bulls and cows are both cattle, I guess...) Any thoughts? RachmaninovDESU 05:39, 3 November 2009 (CET)