Difference between revisions of "Talk:110mb"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Deletion: new section) |
Apostrophe (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Given that we're not on 110mb anymore, should we even have this page around? Or should we keep it to preserve our trolling heritage? Thoughts? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 06:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | Given that we're not on 110mb anymore, should we even have this page around? Or should we keep it to preserve our trolling heritage? Thoughts? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 06:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Yeah, I agree. Just a blurb in the article on ourselves should be suffiient. This is just an eye-bleeding macro and three sentences that are better off elsewhere. Redirect or delete outright. [[User:Apostrophe|Apostrophe]] 03:39, 10 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:39, 9 February 2010
My rage knows no bounds.
The server decides to die when Chris uploads his most epic videos yet, depriving of autistic manchild goodness.
I can't wait to get back to editing and posting, and masturbating and squirtin'.
- Box 16 toot toot Mall Conductor Bear 06:38, 7 May 2009 (CEST)
Why not just buy a domain? Or maybe, a better host?
(Btw, I noticed there are no ads on this site.) DeLemonoid 23:24, 10 May 2009 (CEST)
I've never had a problem as long as it's not Meatspin. Fuckatruck 06:38, 31 May 2009 (CEST)
And we're back again!
Lets start documenting every time 110mb is down. :3 RachmaninovDESU 20:09, 18 September 2009 (CEST)
Deletion
Given that we're not on 110mb anymore, should we even have this page around? Or should we keep it to preserve our trolling heritage? Thoughts? --Champthom 06:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree. Just a blurb in the article on ourselves should be suffiient. This is just an eye-bleeding macro and three sentences that are better off elsewhere. Redirect or delete outright. Apostrophe 03:39, 10 February 2010 (UTC)