Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Featured articles"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Apostrophe (talk | contribs) (Created page with '==Use it or lose it== I see no place where a Featured Article structure has been implemented. It looks like Chris and anger and 2009 were randomly slapped with gold stars…') |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Use it or lose it== | ==Use it or lose it== | ||
I see no place where a Featured Article structure has been implemented. It looks like [[Chris and anger]] and [[2009]] were randomly slapped with gold stars without any sort of process or qualifications. This is clearly not the way to do a featured-article procedure. [[User:Apostrophe|Apostrophe]] 03:05, 23 March 2010 (UTC) | I see no place where a Featured Article structure has been implemented. It looks like [[Chris and anger]] and [[2009]] were randomly slapped with gold stars without any sort of process or qualifications. This is clearly not the way to do a featured-article procedure. [[User:Apostrophe|Apostrophe]] 03:05, 23 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
*I think 2009 was selected because it was near the end of the year and it was to give a look back on what had been done in 2009. What do you suggest then? --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 19:03, 23 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:03, 23 March 2010
Use it or lose it
I see no place where a Featured Article structure has been implemented. It looks like Chris and anger and 2009 were randomly slapped with gold stars without any sort of process or qualifications. This is clearly not the way to do a featured-article procedure. Apostrophe 03:05, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- I think 2009 was selected because it was near the end of the year and it was to give a look back on what had been done in 2009. What do you suggest then? --Edward 19:03, 23 March 2010 (UTC)