Difference between revisions of "Talk:CWC 3D Voice Check"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Not A Forum}}
._.  [[User:Thelieisacake|Thelieisacake]] 22:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
._.  [[User:Thelieisacake|Thelieisacake]] 22:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
*Gah!  Looks like it's been removed.  Hopefully someone snagged it.--[[User:AdderCress|AdderCress]] 22:57, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
*Gah!  Looks like it's been removed.  Hopefully someone snagged it.--[[User:AdderCress|AdderCress]] 22:57, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Line 17: Line 16:


::No, getting them nuked probably isn't a bad thing: we've already backed up all of his stuff so they're really only around to give him an ego stroking, and you see, as his maze animation(which he was all smug over) getting taken down made him have a hissy fit. Taking out his stuff makes him go into rage mode and start rambling against trolls as we've seen; so yes it's very much to our benefit if we get everything we've backed up removed or get him banned, he'd only keep shitting out more anti-troll flip notes and or videos.-[[User:Kei|Kei]] 03:28, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
::No, getting them nuked probably isn't a bad thing: we've already backed up all of his stuff so they're really only around to give him an ego stroking, and you see, as his maze animation(which he was all smug over) getting taken down made him have a hissy fit. Taking out his stuff makes him go into rage mode and start rambling against trolls as we've seen; so yes it's very much to our benefit if we get everything we've backed up removed or get him banned, he'd only keep shitting out more anti-troll flip notes and or videos.-[[User:Kei|Kei]] 03:28, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
::does chris get a warning saying his things got removed because of Personal Content? if so, he either will be confused and pissed, or he'll think he can't write his signature (that's nice chris, show everyone your signature all the time so others can copy it) and will have to get creative and put his name in another way.


== Small request ==
== Small request ==
Line 28: Line 29:
Actually busted out a pair of old 3D glasses to see if it works?--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 05:53, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Actually busted out a pair of old 3D glasses to see if it works?--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 05:53, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
:Very funny Delebonte.  I was actually asking that for the purpose of the article.  It claims it doesn't really work but doesn't go into further detail.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 06:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
:Very funny Delebonte.  I was actually asking that for the purpose of the article.  It claims it doesn't really work but doesn't go into further detail.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 06:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
::I don't have a pair handy, but anyone with a cursory knowledge of anaglyph images could tell you that Chris is doing it wrong.--[[User:Star Platinum|Star Platinum]] 06:53, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
::I was the one who said it didn't work in the article.  I did so because I tested it with a pair of 3d glasses and it, well, didn't work. --[[User:T K 19|T K 19]] 09:20, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Yes let's bore evveryone half to death with an explanation of how 3D works. --[[User:Delabonte|Delabonte]] 07:22, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
:Pretty sure nobody was, and I'm pretty sure everyone who's ever been to Disneyland already knows anyway. [[User:Thelieisacake|Thelieisacake]] 07:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
:I actually adjust my previous statement. Anyone with a cursory knowledge of ''Chris'' could tell you that Chris is doing it wrong.--[[User:Star Platinum|Star Platinum]] 16:20, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
:: I think it's pretty obvious the 3D doesn't work because the red shapes aren't the same as the blue shapes. Just look at Prime's smokestacks. I'm pretty sure Chris thought that putting some red lines next to blue lines would instantly create a 3D experience similar to Avatar and he'd have to beg to stop the masses of pussy from flowing to him. --[[User:OFSheep|OFSheep]] 16:47, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
::: You'll be happy to know I just tested it out with a pair of 3-D glasses and it doesn't work at all. not even kind of. It barely looks like it's sticking out, and some bits (Inspector Gadget and Optimus Prime in particular) are just fucked. I'm going to revise the page to reflect this. EDIT woops forgot to sign. --[[User:DStecks|DStecks]] 21:34, 21 August 2010 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 23:34, 21 August 2010

._. Thelieisacake 22:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Gah! Looks like it's been removed. Hopefully someone snagged it.--AdderCress 22:57, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
    • I summon Edward! In attack mode! Thelieisacake 23:01, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
    • Actually just look at the article. Thelieisacake 23:02, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
  • fucking learn to save shit yourself. go get Downloadhelper for firefox or something. ffs. Clydec 23:02, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Downloadhelper works great. Thank you Clyde.--Beat 02:36, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Please explain how their copyright rules factor in. There's loads of shit about this shit on their site already that doesn't get removed. Thelieisacake 23:52, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

  • It was the most logical reason I could think of. But after reading Djyellow's comment below I could be wrong. Xynar 00:09, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
    • I'm more inclined to think it was because of copyright infringement. Just because you've seen some flipnotes with registered characters that don't get removed doesn't mean that they don't remove them at all, and Chris' flipnotes are getting exposure to the point where they may have felt the need to remove this one because of that. I also don't see a rule against posting your own name in a flipnote, just a few meant to protect the identities of others.--Star Platinum 05:13, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Why the flipnote was removed

Just to note, I reported this Flipnote before it was taken off for "Personal Content."(Like I'm doing with most of Chris's Flipnotes. --Djyellow 23:52, 30 June 2010 (UTC)Djyellow

...I-I'm sorry, but I don't think trying to toss all of Chris's stuff off because of "Personal Content" like his name is the way to go. The guy doxdrops just about every time he talks on YouTube. Just because he puts up "Christian W. Chandler" in each of his stupid Flipnotes is any reason for ANYONE to ditch it. If it's his address or something, fine, but not his name. Let him wallow in his own misery when they find out who he is, not take the initiative.--Blazer 23:57, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Please stop doing that, Dj. Just because he slaps his name up doesn't mean they should be taken down. The entire point of this site is to keep record of everything he does and removing his flipnotes doesn't help with that. --T K 19 00:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
No, getting them nuked probably isn't a bad thing: we've already backed up all of his stuff so they're really only around to give him an ego stroking, and you see, as his maze animation(which he was all smug over) getting taken down made him have a hissy fit. Taking out his stuff makes him go into rage mode and start rambling against trolls as we've seen; so yes it's very much to our benefit if we get everything we've backed up removed or get him banned, he'd only keep shitting out more anti-troll flip notes and or videos.-Kei 03:28, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
does chris get a warning saying his things got removed because of Personal Content? if so, he either will be confused and pissed, or he'll think he can't write his signature (that's nice chris, show everyone your signature all the time so others can copy it) and will have to get creative and put his name in another way.

Small request

Could someone post a link to a downloadable version of this video? For some reason I can't seem to be able to make the Youtube video play.--Jerkop 01:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm having playback problems too. Must be a problem with Youtube or the video's codec. --Eniggy 01:41, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Works fine for me. Just for you, I've uploaded it to RapidShit. http://rapidshare.com/files/404180715/Flipnote_Hatena_-_3-D_Stupidity__www.keepvid.com_.mp4.html Thelieisacake 01:56, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks!--Jerkop 01:59, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

So has anybody...

Actually busted out a pair of old 3D glasses to see if it works?--Beat 05:53, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Very funny Delebonte. I was actually asking that for the purpose of the article. It claims it doesn't really work but doesn't go into further detail.--Beat 06:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
I don't have a pair handy, but anyone with a cursory knowledge of anaglyph images could tell you that Chris is doing it wrong.--Star Platinum 06:53, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
I was the one who said it didn't work in the article. I did so because I tested it with a pair of 3d glasses and it, well, didn't work. --T K 19 09:20, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Yes let's bore evveryone half to death with an explanation of how 3D works. --Delabonte 07:22, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Pretty sure nobody was, and I'm pretty sure everyone who's ever been to Disneyland already knows anyway. Thelieisacake 07:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
I actually adjust my previous statement. Anyone with a cursory knowledge of Chris could tell you that Chris is doing it wrong.--Star Platinum 16:20, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
I think it's pretty obvious the 3D doesn't work because the red shapes aren't the same as the blue shapes. Just look at Prime's smokestacks. I'm pretty sure Chris thought that putting some red lines next to blue lines would instantly create a 3D experience similar to Avatar and he'd have to beg to stop the masses of pussy from flowing to him. --OFSheep 16:47, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
You'll be happy to know I just tested it out with a pair of 3-D glasses and it doesn't work at all. not even kind of. It barely looks like it's sticking out, and some bits (Inspector Gadget and Optimus Prime in particular) are just fucked. I'm going to revise the page to reflect this. EDIT woops forgot to sign. --DStecks 21:34, 21 August 2010 (PDT)