Difference between revisions of "User talk:CrassCrab"
ALBASPERCHU (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
[[Talk:Pedofork|"Chris isn't a pedophile, just stupid. Any and all seemingly pedophiliac "evidence" can easily be attributed to his ignorance. Chris would never harm a child intentionally."]] Neither a pedophile would. Pedophilia is not a choice and its kinda lacking in empathy to say that pedophiles would hurt a child intentionally. Its the same as saying that heterosexuals would hurt women intentionally. It is simply not true. Most pedophiles would never hurt a child. [[User:Philips|Philips]] 20:14, 1 February 2012 (PST) | [[Talk:Pedofork|"Chris isn't a pedophile, just stupid. Any and all seemingly pedophiliac "evidence" can easily be attributed to his ignorance. Chris would never harm a child intentionally."]] Neither a pedophile would. Pedophilia is not a choice and its kinda lacking in empathy to say that pedophiles would hurt a child intentionally. Its the same as saying that heterosexuals would hurt women intentionally. It is simply not true. Most pedophiles would never hurt a child. [[User:Philips|Philips]] 20:14, 1 February 2012 (PST) | ||
:*Children don't have the capacity to understand or give consent to sexual activity. So pedophilia is the same thing as a heterosexual who rapes a girl that is drugged on rufies or is mentally retarded or otherwise incapable of making an informed choice. Bottom line, don't be a pedophilia apologist. [[User:ALBASPERCHU|ALBASPERCHU]] 12:12, 23 February 2012 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:12, 23 February 2012
Hi there!
Welcome to CWCki! There's a lot to do around here because Chris never does anything himself. I hope you'll stay with us and make many improvements of your own!
- Before you start, be sure to read A Quick Guide to CWCki. This will guide you through the dos and don'ts of editing the world's most accurate wiki. Be especially sure to read this if you consider Anonymous to be legion or if you've just come over from ED. Everything you know is wrong.
- Recent changes is a great first stop, because you can see what other people are editing right this minute, and where you can help.
- If you're looking for things to do, check out the priority listing for things that need to be done, or join a project.
- If you haven't already, create a user page about yourself! If you do, we'll be able to know you better as a member of our community. Just be sure to check out the guidelines first.
- Questions? Please read the FAQ first. Later, you can ask in the Community Portal or on the "discussion" page associated with each article, join the live chat in our IRC channel or post a message on my talk page!
- Once again, welcome to CWCki!
PRO TIP
When you use the Welcome template:
- be sure to replace your name after the |, so it'd be {{Welcome|CrassCrab}}. Looks like you copy and pasted it from a time I did it, so it keeps linking to my user page. Nothing wrong with that, new people are welcome to ask me stuff, but since you extended it maybe you'd like to do it too.
- be sure to sign after you do it, so people know who you are (it's four ~ in a row).
The more you know.--Champthom 19:20, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
MAKE CRASS AN ADMIN
DO IT CHAMP, IF I CAN'T GET POWERS, NO ONE CAN EXCEPT CRASS Clydec 16:07, 9 September 2010 (PDT)
UNDO QUESTION
Hey, hope you don't mind me asking this here. That recent guy who has been going around vandalizing pages has been adding a lot of text into the pages. Whenever I try to hit undo I just get a server error due to the size but you seem to manage reverting those easily. Is there some trick to doing it or is it just because my computer is shit? Next time I see it happen I would like to be able to help incase nobody else is around. -- Lunachu 08:59, 12 September 2010 (PDT)
- I also get the error, but since I'm a jerkop I don't have to go into the actual edit, I can just hit rollback on the recent changes page. It's really not that big of a deal just letting the vandalism remain until a jerkop or admin gets around to reverting it. For now my biggest concern is people antagonizing the vandals, like Eniggy has been doing, thus why I blocked him for a day. CrassCrab 09:05, 12 September 2010 (PDT)
- Oh I see! Thanks for telling me, I'll just relax and trust that the jerkops are watching. -- Lunachu 09:09, 12 September 2010 (PDT)
- Somebody is usually around. CrassCrab 09:12, 12 September 2010 (PDT)
Speculation
Did you move it before deleting it, that is the question. --Anonymax 13:44, 5 October 2010 (PDT)
- a bit late for that, we had to get rid of it permanently to reduce memory usage. i'm sure better speculation can be fostered on the new forum. Clydec 13:58, 5 October 2010 (PDT)
Mommy! Daddy! Stop fighting! CrassCrab 14:08, 5 October 2010 (PDT)
"Chris would never harm a child intentionally"... so pedophiles would?
"Chris isn't a pedophile, just stupid. Any and all seemingly pedophiliac "evidence" can easily be attributed to his ignorance. Chris would never harm a child intentionally." Neither a pedophile would. Pedophilia is not a choice and its kinda lacking in empathy to say that pedophiles would hurt a child intentionally. Its the same as saying that heterosexuals would hurt women intentionally. It is simply not true. Most pedophiles would never hurt a child. Philips 20:14, 1 February 2012 (PST)
- Children don't have the capacity to understand or give consent to sexual activity. So pedophilia is the same thing as a heterosexual who rapes a girl that is drugged on rufies or is mentally retarded or otherwise incapable of making an informed choice. Bottom line, don't be a pedophilia apologist. ALBASPERCHU 12:12, 23 February 2012 (CST)