Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chris and depression"
Alan Pardew (talk | contribs) |
m (Coment) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I hate to bum the new user who started this article but I say we delete this. It feels too A-loggy, plus we already have a Chris and Psychology article, and second I'm pretty much against users speculating about Chris's mental state. - [[User:NegaCWC|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC|talk]]) 22:43, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | I hate to bum the new user who started this article but I say we delete this. It feels too A-loggy, plus we already have a Chris and Psychology article, and second I'm pretty much against users speculating about Chris's mental state. - [[User:NegaCWC|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC|talk]]) 22:43, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
* I was about to say, we do have that Chris and psychology article, it can easily go there. Though I don't think we have too much concrete about Chris actually being depressed. Maybe in a very colloquial sense but not in a clinical sense. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] ([[User talk:Champthom|talk]]) 07:08, 20 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
I didn't just sit there and write an article bashing him; at the least I listed multiple reasons for why he would be that way, a quote of him being depressed, and the two bottom parts are just a filler. I didn't create it to bash, I just didn't really notice an article going over it, and the closest to it being would be [[stress]]. I wasn't really going to write a giant article on the spot. And speculation? It's pretty much spot on. --[[User:Toggletogs|Toggletogs]] ([[User talk:Toggletogs|talk]]) 06:34, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
I leave it as an article for deletion for now. If you want to make an article as a filler try making the article in your user space, such as [[User:Toggletogs/Chris and depression]]. [[User:Alan Pardew|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew|talk]]) 10:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
As it stands, this article is mostly redundant with the [[stress]] article, but spinning the actually-depression-being-called-stress-because-Chris-has-a-terrible-vocabulary content onto this article sounds like a non-terrible idea to me. [[User:Nate-Kar Sonichu|Nathan]] ([[User talk:Nate-Kar Sonichu|talk]]) 18:35, 28 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:35, 28 March 2014
I hate to bum the new user who started this article but I say we delete this. It feels too A-loggy, plus we already have a Chris and Psychology article, and second I'm pretty much against users speculating about Chris's mental state. - NegaCWC (talk) 22:43, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- I was about to say, we do have that Chris and psychology article, it can easily go there. Though I don't think we have too much concrete about Chris actually being depressed. Maybe in a very colloquial sense but not in a clinical sense. --Champthom (talk) 07:08, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
I didn't just sit there and write an article bashing him; at the least I listed multiple reasons for why he would be that way, a quote of him being depressed, and the two bottom parts are just a filler. I didn't create it to bash, I just didn't really notice an article going over it, and the closest to it being would be stress. I wasn't really going to write a giant article on the spot. And speculation? It's pretty much spot on. --Toggletogs (talk) 06:34, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
I leave it as an article for deletion for now. If you want to make an article as a filler try making the article in your user space, such as User:Toggletogs/Chris and depression. Alan Pardew (talk) 10:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
As it stands, this article is mostly redundant with the stress article, but spinning the actually-depression-being-called-stress-because-Chris-has-a-terrible-vocabulary content onto this article sounds like a non-terrible idea to me. Nathan (talk) 18:35, 28 March 2014 (UTC)