Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pedofork"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
"...portmanteau for 'pedophile' and 'dork'" Just curious, has that been proven? It could just be that he was thinking of a less-offensive word that started with "f", and "fork" was the first thing that came to mind. [[User:Ayvuir|Ayvuir]] 19:03, 27 September 2009 (CEST)
"...portmanteau for 'pedophile' and 'dork'" Just curious, has that been proven? It could just be that he was thinking of a less-offensive word that started with "f", and "fork" was the first thing that came to mind. [[User:Ayvuir|Ayvuir]] 19:03, 27 September 2009 (CEST)
*I think it's just assumed the word he wanted was 'dork' as he's called trolls dorks in several of his videos. I'm not sure why it's spelt 'pedofork' instead of 'pedophork' though. [[User:SirCucumber|SirCucumber]] 19:11, 27 September 2009 (CEST)
*I think it's just assumed the word he wanted was 'dork' as he's called trolls dorks in several of his videos. I'm not sure why it's spelt 'pedofork' instead of 'pedophork' though. [[User:SirCucumber|SirCucumber]] 19:11, 27 September 2009 (CEST)
** Spelling is not one of Chris's strong suits. Not that he has any. --[[User:DStecks|DStecks]] 02:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


I was going to suggest something along the lines of a "Evidence Chris is a pedofork" similar to the homo page, though there seems to be more evidence to the contrary. Even Lucas made a post in that Q&A thread along the lines of "Chris really never showed any signs like that, but if you wanna argue it, you can try" (which, BTW, was one of the few nice things he said about Chris). --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 15:37, 26 November 2009 (CET)
I was going to suggest something along the lines of a "Evidence Chris is a pedofork" similar to the homo page, though there seems to be more evidence to the contrary. Even Lucas made a post in that Q&A thread along the lines of "Chris really never showed any signs like that, but if you wanna argue it, you can try" (which, BTW, was one of the few nice things he said about Chris). --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 15:37, 26 November 2009 (CET)


Lolisa: I dunno about that. I mean, she's ironically the MILF of all Rosechus. I wonder, what influence Chris used to name this character? Or maybe he completely misundrstood what "lolita" means? --[[User:GokuGetEm|GokuGetEm]] 10:50, 29 November 2009 (CET)
Lolisa: I dunno about that. I mean, she's ironically the MILF of all Rosechus. I wonder, what influence Chris used to name this character? Or maybe he completely misundrstood what "lolita" means? --[[User:GokuGetEm|GokuGetEm]] 10:50, 29 November 2009 (CET)
* I honestly think it might just be a co-incindence. --[[User:DStecks|DStecks]] 02:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
{{JumpToConclusions}}
Get rid of the stupid shit on this page already. -- [[User:Clydec|Clyde]] 02:01, 27 October 2010 (PDT)
:*Yes, I concur. This thread is complete shit and should be shot to the moon. Chris isn't a pedophile, just stupid. Any and all seemingly pedophiliac "evidence" can easily be attributed to his ignorance. Chris would never harm a child intentionally. The only thing we should concern ourselves with is his use of the term "pedofork". [[User:CrassCrab|CrassCrab]] 10:55, 24 November 2010 (PST)
EDIT: Removed all speculative bullshit. Perhaps we should add pedofork to a CWCism article. [[User:CrassCrab|CrassCrab]] 11:01, 24 November 2010 (PST)
Should this page have a "Usage by Chris" and "Other references" with instances of pedofork being used? [[User:Nullity|Nullity]] 00:05, 27 April 2011 (PDT)
*Definitely, this article should serve more as a way of keeping track instances where Chris has used the term pedofork as opposed to speculating Chris being one.--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 06:54, 27 April 2011 (PDT)
*i think the only time he used the word, outside of that one classic video, is in [[ChrisChanSonichu and WikiSysop correspondence]] --[[User:Acousticvirgin|Acousticvirgin]] 17:55, 27 April 2011 (PDT)
*Holy crap, the article has changed A LOT. Perhaps this could be incorporated into the [[Minor CWC-isms]] page? I mean, sure, it's popular but if Chris has only said it twice, does it warrant its own page? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 06:02, 28 April 2011 (PDT)
**Well, Clyde came around [http://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=Pedofork&action=historysubmit&diff=122332&oldid=121423 and fucked it up], then CrassCrab came and [http://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=Pedofork&action=historysubmit&diff=127850&oldid=127834 fucked it up even more]. --[[User:Sonijew is back|Sonijew is back]] 07:38, 29 April 2011 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 13:39, 8 August 2014

"...portmanteau for 'pedophile' and 'dork'" Just curious, has that been proven? It could just be that he was thinking of a less-offensive word that started with "f", and "fork" was the first thing that came to mind. Ayvuir 19:03, 27 September 2009 (CEST)

  • I think it's just assumed the word he wanted was 'dork' as he's called trolls dorks in several of his videos. I'm not sure why it's spelt 'pedofork' instead of 'pedophork' though. SirCucumber 19:11, 27 September 2009 (CEST)
    • Spelling is not one of Chris's strong suits. Not that he has any. --DStecks 02:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

I was going to suggest something along the lines of a "Evidence Chris is a pedofork" similar to the homo page, though there seems to be more evidence to the contrary. Even Lucas made a post in that Q&A thread along the lines of "Chris really never showed any signs like that, but if you wanna argue it, you can try" (which, BTW, was one of the few nice things he said about Chris). --Champthom 15:37, 26 November 2009 (CET)

Lolisa: I dunno about that. I mean, she's ironically the MILF of all Rosechus. I wonder, what influence Chris used to name this character? Or maybe he completely misundrstood what "lolita" means? --GokuGetEm 10:50, 29 November 2009 (CET)

  • I honestly think it might just be a co-incindence. --DStecks 02:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Jtc.gif

Get rid of the stupid shit on this page already. -- Clyde 02:01, 27 October 2010 (PDT)

  • Yes, I concur. This thread is complete shit and should be shot to the moon. Chris isn't a pedophile, just stupid. Any and all seemingly pedophiliac "evidence" can easily be attributed to his ignorance. Chris would never harm a child intentionally. The only thing we should concern ourselves with is his use of the term "pedofork". CrassCrab 10:55, 24 November 2010 (PST)

EDIT: Removed all speculative bullshit. Perhaps we should add pedofork to a CWCism article. CrassCrab 11:01, 24 November 2010 (PST)

Should this page have a "Usage by Chris" and "Other references" with instances of pedofork being used? Nullity 00:05, 27 April 2011 (PDT)

  • Definitely, this article should serve more as a way of keeping track instances where Chris has used the term pedofork as opposed to speculating Chris being one.--Champthom 06:54, 27 April 2011 (PDT)
  • i think the only time he used the word, outside of that one classic video, is in ChrisChanSonichu and WikiSysop correspondence --Acousticvirgin 17:55, 27 April 2011 (PDT)
  • Holy crap, the article has changed A LOT. Perhaps this could be incorporated into the Minor CWC-isms page? I mean, sure, it's popular but if Chris has only said it twice, does it warrant its own page? --Champthom 06:02, 28 April 2011 (PDT)