Difference between revisions of "Talk:2011"
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==THE FUCK IS ALL THIS?== | ==THE FUCK IS ALL THIS?== | ||
This shit is bollocks. I am asking for the deletion of the 2011 article on the grounds that it's all speculative. Take this faggotry to /cwc/. [[User:CrassCrab|CrassCrab]] 12:37, 3 August 2010 (PDT) | This shit is bollocks. I am asking for the deletion of the 2011 article on the grounds that it's all speculative. Take this faggotry to /cwc/. [[User:CrassCrab|CrassCrab]] 12:37, 3 August 2010 (PDT) | ||
* Rather than speculative, it's a joke. Still, seconded. --[[User:Schuzrum-dias|Schuzrum Dias]] 12:42, 3 August 2010 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:42, 3 August 2010
December 21
"Patti's body is resurrected by Mayan tribesmen in preparation for the 13th baktun."
Isn't the big year 2012? --CWCAttack 02:51, 17 December 2009 (CET)
Rule of funny. --DStecks 18:40, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Do we really need the shoehorned in Evangelion reference? It contributes naught to the article and isn't very funny. --manwithoutabody 19:19, 2 July 2010 (CEST)
Dealt with. --Edward 23:56, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
WHAT?!? The Evangellion refference was one of the funniest things on here. I don't know how you figured it was unfunny! --zartok-35
- And this is why I hate Evangelion fans. Pfargtl9000 Spam and Eggs 20:21, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Can we bring back the bit about the kidnapping spree and trying to build a girlfriend? The car chase ending doesnt make sense otherwise. Dkd 19:57, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Fuck it I'll do it Dkd 19:58, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
THE FUCK IS ALL THIS?
This shit is bollocks. I am asking for the deletion of the 2011 article on the grounds that it's all speculative. Take this faggotry to /cwc/. CrassCrab 12:37, 3 August 2010 (PDT)
- Rather than speculative, it's a joke. Still, seconded. --Schuzrum Dias 12:42, 3 August 2010 (PDT)