Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wallflower E-mails 1"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Caboose -1 (talk | contribs) (Dates have been put in) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Like the ancient Hawaiians used to say: Even the thickest coconut will break if hit with a big enough rock.--[[User:Caboose -1|Caboose -1]] 12:43, 25 September 2010 (PDT) | :Like the ancient Hawaiians used to say: Even the thickest coconut will break if hit with a big enough rock.--[[User:Caboose -1|Caboose -1]] 12:43, 25 September 2010 (PDT) | ||
You know, I've been thinking, I've always hated the "censored" part as censoring really isn't our bag. Would it be too much to use the term "redacted" instead or should we preserve Tito's choice of words. Thoughts?--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 16:00, 9 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 18:00, 9 April 2011
I'll let you guys know when I'm finished uploading these. These are formatted like shit. Clydec 00:26, 25 September 2010 (PDT)
I'll split up the article. I think this works best in 3 acts. Act 1: Intro. Act 2: Owls. Act 3: The end. This part is through. Have at it. Clydec 00:31, 25 September 2010 (PDT)
If chris doesn't believe I fucked The Wallflower now, idk what will. SurfShackTito 00:55, 25 September 2010 (PDT)
- Like the ancient Hawaiians used to say: Even the thickest coconut will break if hit with a big enough rock.--Caboose -1 12:43, 25 September 2010 (PDT)
You know, I've been thinking, I've always hated the "censored" part as censoring really isn't our bag. Would it be too much to use the term "redacted" instead or should we preserve Tito's choice of words. Thoughts?--Champthom 16:00, 9 April 2011 (PDT)