Talk:Asperchu is a Horrendous Joke

Fuck, Chris just made me lose the game. He hasn't done that since 2008. Isarko 08:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

• Now he's really gone off to be a complete and utter narcissistic bastard. --Hayate666 12:55, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

I shall commence with the TRANSCRIBING of DIS BITCH! Upon reaching minute number five I will quit, because It's fucking late.--Beat 08:28, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

• I'll take minute five to the end. Alteceastlansing 08:33, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Cool. First 5 are done. There was one point near the beginning I couldn't figure out what the hell he was saying. Also the amount of lying Chris is doing in this video is just amazing.--Beat 09:16, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Got done with the rest...looks like we finished up at about the same time. Alteceastlansing 09:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Jesus.

Does anyone else find "I hope the soul of my late dog eats at your souls and kills you in your sleep." Really, really disturbing? I mean, even for Chris standards. Jesus Christ.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Nafka (talk • contribs)

• Damn. I take a break from CWC for a single DAY and Chris find a way to dig himself deeper in his own hole... Griffintown 19:48, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
• Yeah, Patti was his only sympathetic trait, and now even that's gone. Someone needs to point out to Chris that Ian definitely shot Liquid in his comics. Isarko 22:10, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Done. --Briscoe 22:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

The homosexual references.

When Chris starts talking about the homosexual references in the date episode, at this point in the video transcription:

But I could get- I could definitely reference a few more instances of where he actually is considering peeing on himself within his own comic series. Starting with, of course, with a few from his first book of graphic nudity or sexual reference on page three of his 0 book. Even worse off, on page 10, and while he's in that Burger King! With all his goddamned homosexual references as well! [Chris shuffles through a variety of pages featuring the Asperchu date plot in book one. None of them contain any homosexual references. He then returns to the page select.]

I think he's refering to the New Moon posters in the background that have shirtless and naked guys on them (you can't really see them in the poor camera quality, however). So Chris isn't completely wrong in this respect. Fefnir 20:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

• Actually, he is wrong. They're male models or something, right? Does that mean they're gay? In Chris's view, a male model in a suggestive pose would constitute "homosexual reference," but he's an idiot. Considering that they're photoshopped into posters for Twilight: New Moon, they're meant for females to gawk at. Chris is, yet again displaying his overactive homophobia.--Jewlay 20:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

• I transcribed that part, and yeah, I couldn't see any half-naked dudes with Chris's crappy video quality (that and the fact he's fucking filming his TV). My bad dudes. Still, to automatically assume as buff guy is a "homosexual reference" is a bit much.--Beat 20:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

• Yeah, I see what you guys mean. I just remembered it and guessed that was what Chris was refering to as "homosexual". It's not that he was right about about them being gay references, so, sorry 'bout that. Fefnir 09:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

I love how he claimed that the image of Jivin banging Heaven was a "homosexual reference". Also, even the word "fag" seems to disturb him.--MoarLurk 17:46, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

CWCville is real

I think this video cements the theory that CWCville is a real place in Chris's mind. Notice how he is completely serious coming up with a possible explanation for how Sonichu is in the Asperchu comic, and then clarifies that there have been no law changes in CWCville. --Raikonos 21:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

I've been thinking that for a while, too. There's probably some deep psychological explanation for it involving escapism and mental illness, but I bet you anything he'll say it's real. And if he ever admits it's not, it'll be "because of my autism". I bet you a thousand goddamn dollars. --Nafka 04:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

If Cwcville is real I can assure it's probably a smoldering crater, I mean what kind of living being would let Chris run a city?--Pikimon 04:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

The 'real' CWCville is the LEGO shantytown that Chris has spent his entire life mashing together. Nobody else has picked up on that? It's his ultimate fetish. The amulets, the amyfist ring, those are secondary - his reaction when the amulet was stolen is proof of that. I'm not sure how this came to be, and I'm not sure what the specifics of this delusion are (does he consider the lego people to be real people, for instance) but I have absolutely no doubt whatsoever that 'real CWCville' = the mass of mismatched, color-clashing LEGOs in his room. He thinks of it as a real city. --DirtyCrappedBriefs 19:19, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

You rage you ruse

This saga has been off to a booming start, and now we have a video even more frustrating than whatever the fuck the video should be called also this whole "former buddha belly" delusion thing has been fucking hilarious! --Briscoe 22:18, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

• I never thought it could happen, but Asperchu Saga might actually make Chris ragequit. After watching this and going through Mailbag 41, I think that the explosion of tard-rage might be visible from space. Isarko 03:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Mao's rebuttal

Should we transcribe Mao's rebuttal that calls Chris out on all this bullshit? I mean since Mao does kinda speak kinda low unless the audio's up far enough (or maybe it's just me). Flyingdingo0827 06:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

• Either way, I don't see why not. Just let's not forget Mao's catch phrase in the end of his videos. --CWCAttack 00:43, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

• When dealing with non-CWC videos, the general rule is that a "conversation" (like what's going on here) should be transcribed, but "fan art" should not be. --Dude 06:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

• I think though that unless Chris responds to this rebuttal video or references it in a future video, we shouldn't really transcribe it. Liquid videos are usually transcribed because Chris will reference these videos in the future and they're part of a conversation. Right now, it's a typical one sided conversation and Mao's videos are mostly in trolling Chris and not part of a genuine dialogue. --Champthom 06:39, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

• Ah, good point; then it can wait for a response. --Dude 06:43, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Unrelated to all that, is there a standard videobox template to use for relevant troll videos?--Beat 06:48, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Mao's Response Video

Is it possible to re-upload it? If not, we should get rid of the section with the rebuttal.

Person above didn't sign, but anways: rebuttal video needs re-linking.--Xavier orona 21:26, 8 January 2011 (PST)

My bad, it was me. I didn't sign. Agh!-- darkhorse816 22:50, 31, January 2011 (CST)

The video is private. Doesn't matter. Nullity 23:06, 10 April 2011 (PDT)