Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fandoms"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→The article) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*My main issue with this article is that it doesn't actually SAY anything. So far it seems like dead weight. Does anyone have an actual plan on what this article is supposed to be? I don't even know if it should be a page at all until that's decided. [[User:Freecell|Freecell]] [[User_talk:Freecell|(t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Freecell|c)]] 14:08, 27 May 2011 (PDT) | *My main issue with this article is that it doesn't actually SAY anything. So far it seems like dead weight. Does anyone have an actual plan on what this article is supposed to be? I don't even know if it should be a page at all until that's decided. [[User:Freecell|Freecell]] [[User_talk:Freecell|(t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Freecell|c)]] 14:08, 27 May 2011 (PDT) | ||
**Well I didn't make the article, but I could see adding why Chris is a fan of these things (i.e. all the childish things due to him being still a child, the ancient sitcoms because of his ancient parents) but I don't really know the proper ins and outs of the CWCki, and i know speculation is frowned upon. Hopefully it means we can also get rid of all the stub articles about things he refers to once or twice at least. [[User:Lorrihed|Lorrihed]] 14:20, 27 May 2011 (PDT) | **Well I didn't make the article, but I could see adding why Chris is a fan of these things (i.e. all the childish things due to him being still a child, the ancient sitcoms because of his ancient parents) but I don't really know the proper ins and outs of the CWCki, and i know speculation is frowned upon. Hopefully it means we can also get rid of all the stub articles about things he refers to once or twice at least. [[User:Lorrihed|Lorrihed]] 14:20, 27 May 2011 (PDT) | ||
*Well that's a plus. It would be good to cut down all the stub articles. I'm not sure what Champ will think of this though. I'd prefer a different title personally. Fandoms sounds a bit vauge. Also, I don't think it should be separated into "major" and "minor" fandoms or whatever. That's a bit vauge too and would be hard to classify. We don't know exactly how how closely Chris follows any of these anymore. I think it'd be better to classify them by format. TV shows, movies, cartoons, anime, literature, ect. That's just what I think anyway. | |||
Revision as of 19:53, 27 May 2011
You really need to make a rough draft of these pages before you start making them. --Old meme 08:08, 27 May 2011 (PDT)
- sorry, I'm kinda new to wiki editing =/ --Elliebytes 08:14, 27 May 2011 (PDT)
The article
I fixed it up a bit, but it still needs stuff adding to it. Also, would this page be better suited as a "chris and..." article? that's my personal opinion, but i won't change it yet. Lorrihed 14:00, 27 May 2011 (PDT)
- My main issue with this article is that it doesn't actually SAY anything. So far it seems like dead weight. Does anyone have an actual plan on what this article is supposed to be? I don't even know if it should be a page at all until that's decided. Freecell (t/c) 14:08, 27 May 2011 (PDT)
- Well I didn't make the article, but I could see adding why Chris is a fan of these things (i.e. all the childish things due to him being still a child, the ancient sitcoms because of his ancient parents) but I don't really know the proper ins and outs of the CWCki, and i know speculation is frowned upon. Hopefully it means we can also get rid of all the stub articles about things he refers to once or twice at least. Lorrihed 14:20, 27 May 2011 (PDT)
- Well that's a plus. It would be good to cut down all the stub articles. I'm not sure what Champ will think of this though. I'd prefer a different title personally. Fandoms sounds a bit vauge. Also, I don't think it should be separated into "major" and "minor" fandoms or whatever. That's a bit vauge too and would be hard to classify. We don't know exactly how how closely Chris follows any of these anymore. I think it'd be better to classify them by format. TV shows, movies, cartoons, anime, literature, ect. That's just what I think anyway.