Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Sweethearts"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Rosie Palms== | ==Rosie Palms== | ||
Well played, whoever did that. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 07:33, 10 December 2009 (CET) | Well played, whoever did that. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 07:33, 10 December 2009 (CET) | ||
*Thnx :) --[[User:GokuGetEm|GokuGetEm]] 09:52, 16 December 2009 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 03:52, 16 December 2009
Kacey isn't a proper sweetheart, but that's my thought. Thoughts? --Champthom 20:36, 8 November 2009 (CET)
- I'd say she is. I mean, Chris thought she was his girlfriend and referred to her as such. --Beat 20:51, 8 November 2009 (CET)
Explanation
- Put all sweethearts in a single "Past" section, to create an impressive chronological list;
- Added several "sweethearts-for-a-day", as they were as much romantic interests for Chris, as the long-term ones;
- Mixed real girls and things like "Officer Nasty" together, because imo it's hilarious and shows well Chris' level of patheticness;
- Added gal-pals, because with Chris, a girl may well be present on both lists (e.g., Megan, Sarah).
- If I'm wrong, feel free to correct me --GokuGetEm 17:54, 30 November 2009 (CET)
Rosie Palms
Well played, whoever did that. --Champthom 07:33, 10 December 2009 (CET)
- Thnx :) --GokuGetEm 09:52, 16 December 2009 (CET)