Difference between revisions of "CWCki talk:Community Portal"
(→Quality portal?: new section) |
|||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
TIME TO CHANGE THE FORUM LINK. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Slimz|Slimz]] ([[User talk:Slimz|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Slimz|contribs]]) </span></small> | TIME TO CHANGE THE FORUM LINK. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Slimz|Slimz]] ([[User talk:Slimz|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Slimz|contribs]]) </span></small> | ||
:Time for you to stop typing in caps and to [[Template:Sign|sign your shit]]. --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 07:54, 9 January 2012 (PST) | :Time for you to stop typing in caps and to [[Template:Sign|sign your shit]]. --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 07:54, 9 January 2012 (PST) | ||
== Quality portal? == | |||
Crazy idea I'm just throwing out here, how about a portal to discuss article quality issues? People bitch about the quality of articles, why not give them a place to bring their concerns so we can address them? Like I said, just a crazy idea I have and I'd like some feedback first.--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 08:15, 10 January 2012 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 11:15, 10 January 2012
are there any other pages that need adding? --Cogsdev 22:30, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe either a general user decision area or a general talk area? --Eniggy 04:56, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with Eniggy, there should be a general discussion area for users to discuss general topics on Chrissy boy and his latest exploits. Please Coggy, make this a reality! --Chris_Pickles 23:47, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
this thing was a failure, i suggest merging everything back EXCEPT for speculation. Clydec 12:03, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
- Also I demand a new admin besides champ because he's not here a lot now. Clydec 22:03, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
- Just someone who's on here a lot or someone with web editing experience? You could see if someone like Anonymax would do it, he does tons of editing on here everyday. --Caboose -1 22:33, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
- i don't think web editing is going to help in this position. i'd nominate anonymax too Clydec 22:34, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
- I vote merge too. And if you guys need help I'll provide some assistance.--Wintermute 20:54, 4 October 2010 (PDT)
- I also vote for merge. Speculation overflowed while the other sections barely had anything on them.--trombonista 21:12, 9 October 2010 (PDT)
- I agree merge,also Clyde should be admin.--EpicBeta 21:49, 12 October 2010 (PDT)
- I also vote for merge. Speculation overflowed while the other sections barely had anything on them.--trombonista 21:12, 9 October 2010 (PDT)
- I vote merge too. And if you guys need help I'll provide some assistance.--Wintermute 20:54, 4 October 2010 (PDT)
- i don't think web editing is going to help in this position. i'd nominate anonymax too Clydec 22:34, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
- Just someone who's on here a lot or someone with web editing experience? You could see if someone like Anonymax would do it, he does tons of editing on here everyday. --Caboose -1 22:33, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
Serious discussion overhauling this portal
Policy/Suggestions/General and that's it. (Policy would have both editing policy and community policy) -- Clyde 08:53, 2 November 2010 (PDT)
Sightings
- question, where should sightings be put under? CFA 20:55, 19 December 2010 (PST)CFA
Need new URL to Offshore CWCki
The link is dead. Can someone fix that? Masterspark 17:49, 14 January 2011 (PST)
The Offshore CWCki has been dead, was there a reason? Barachulove 21:41, 11 February 2011 (PST)
Speculation page
To prevent what happened here, can we have the speculation page back? Offshore cwcki failed, and I know a lot of higher-ups dislike speculation, but at least if we had that page back it would be contained to one area. --Ronichu 05:06, 2 May 2011 (PDT)
New forum location
forum link should be http://cwcki.forumer.com/
tru dat. Eamoo 03:10, 5 January 2012 (PST)
TIME TO CHANGE THE FORUM LINK
TIME TO CHANGE THE FORUM LINK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slimz (talk • contribs)
- Time for you to stop typing in caps and to sign your shit. --Anonymax 07:54, 9 January 2012 (PST)
Quality portal?
Crazy idea I'm just throwing out here, how about a portal to discuss article quality issues? People bitch about the quality of articles, why not give them a place to bring their concerns so we can address them? Like I said, just a crazy idea I have and I'd like some feedback first.--Champthom 08:15, 10 January 2012 (PST)