Difference between revisions of "Talk:Da Update (CWC-ism)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (8 revisions) |
|
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 03:42, 3 January 2010
16 March 2006
I deleted it because considering the account was created yesterday, I'm guessing it's not the real panda. If it is, I'd like to see some proof of it. --Champthom 15:00, 16 March 2009 (CET)
Da duplicate
Suggestion: Redirect this page to 2009 so we don't have to update 3 pages (including the template) every time something happens. Axe 14:25, 2 May 2009 (CEST)
- I think maybe we should just make this page into a definition of what "Da Update" is, defined, and then have a notice to consult the CWChronology for the latest updates. --Champthom 01:19, 4 July 2009 (CEST)
- Agreed. Do it to it. Llort 01:32, 4 July 2009 (CEST)
In canon usage
A brief note about how this came about in canon (that is, the exact context Chris asks "Hey guys, what's da update?") along with the page Chris says this in so people can understand the original context.--Champthom 10:28, 18 October 2009 (CEST)