Difference between revisions of "Talk:Isabella Loretta Janke"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Dropping the "Everfree Suitress" name: new section) |
m (Reverted edits by PsychoNerd054 (talk) to last revision by Necromaster) Tag: Rollback |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
I added the quote back in for the moment since many people seemed fine with it but I wont rage if people don't want it there. | I added the quote back in for the moment since many people seemed fine with it but I wont rage if people don't want it there. | ||
Revision as of 14:36, 3 September 2021
How would you classify her in the Unholy Tetrad? She obviously has weenish and A-Loggy elements about her. FokkerTISM (talk) 06:56, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- I saw some sort of political compass looking thing for all 4 of them, which I think is a much better model than the one we currently have. I'll have to go find it first. PsychoNerd (talk) 04:43, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Planned Article Order
So with the way things are right now. I am currently hoping for the article to go in this order:
- Introduction to Bella (Introductory Paragraphs)
- Bella meeting Chris ("The Beginning of the End")
- Major Players ("The Everfree Suitress" and "Related People")
- I feel the Suitress warrants her own section just for how involved she was with Chris.
- The Incest Leaks ("Response to the Incest").
- I feel this should come after the former, as many of the major players mentioned were somehow involved with twisting up what really happened (Including fabricating an entire set of BDSM sessions between Chris and Barb), and the Suitress was ultimately the one that leaked the incest calls.
Feel free to make further suggestions. PsychoNerd (talk) 04:44, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Top quote
I noticed the top quote was edited out by a user that didn't personally feel it fit, to prevent an edit war can we have a vote or something?
Or maybe suggestions for a better fitting one to summarize this person?
I added the quote back in for the moment since many people seemed fine with it but I wont rage if people don't want it there.