Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mailbag 39"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
He just did.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 05:27, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
He just did.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 05:27, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
* Impressed. I really am.--[[User:Blazer|Blazer]] 05:29, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
* Impressed. I really am.--[[User:Blazer|Blazer]] 05:29, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
== How long does the mailbag have? ==
He's just deleting e-mails now without even putting them in the rejected section.  How long until he just refuses to answer questions? [[User:JamieTyler|JamieTyler]] 08:56, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:56, 13 January 2010

I guess we're at the point where if a letter doesn't make Chris get the rage, it's not worth sending.--Beat 15:06, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

That may be why he's refusing to answer them. Or maybe the Asperchu is causing him to crash into slumber. --OFSheep 16:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm hoping for a particularly lulzy bout of tard rage from my email (the suicide one). I'm worried that it might just get rejected though. :( BTW I fucking LOL'd at Arle Nadja! Puyo Puyo terrorists FTW! - Cadpig 19:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Thank you, I pride myself in my work. The little bitch deleted my e-mail though. I think it's time Satan-sama sent him a message. NasuGrave 21:47, 12 January 2010 (UTC)


experiement of mailbags 38+39= don't filter at all (well save for some really fucking retarded ones.) Clydec 18:40, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

CRASH INTO SLUMBER

He just did.--Beat 05:27, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

  • Impressed. I really am.--Blazer 05:29, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

How long does the mailbag have?

He's just deleting e-mails now without even putting them in the rejected section. How long until he just refuses to answer questions? JamieTyler 08:56, 13 January 2010 (UTC)