Difference between revisions of "Talk:Zapina"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
*''No.'' She resembles another, but my brain fails me on which one. I think it was one of the Gold/Silver creatures, but I don't remember.--[[User:Blazer|Blazer]] 19:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
*''No.'' She resembles another, but my brain fails me on which one. I think it was one of the Gold/Silver creatures, but I don't remember.--[[User:Blazer|Blazer]] 19:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
**I'm not seeing it among any of the bug 'mons. Or any 'mon at all. [[User:Apostrophe|Apostrophe]] 19:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
**I'm not seeing it among any of the bug 'mons. Or any 'mon at all. [[User:Apostrophe|Apostrophe]] 19:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
*My personal theory is that her design isn't based on any actual character, but is instead constructed from what he considers hot. Honestly, nobody could truly say "I am not a pedophile" and dress an underage character in ''that''. Unless of course, that was part of their characterization, that they are overly sexual for their age, but that is clearly not the case here, as no fewer than three characters have stated that she should be ''more'' sexual, ignoring the fact that characterization of that type is far beyond Chris's capabilities. tl;dr: She isn't Asuka, she's just a pedo fap fantasy. --[[User:DStecks|DStecks]] 20:42, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:42, 23 March 2010

Looks

I don't think she was copied one bit from Illumise. Does she really look anything like this? Apostrophe 18:30, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

  • No. She resembles another, but my brain fails me on which one. I think it was one of the Gold/Silver creatures, but I don't remember.--Blazer 19:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
    • I'm not seeing it among any of the bug 'mons. Or any 'mon at all. Apostrophe 19:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  • My personal theory is that her design isn't based on any actual character, but is instead constructed from what he considers hot. Honestly, nobody could truly say "I am not a pedophile" and dress an underage character in that. Unless of course, that was part of their characterization, that they are overly sexual for their age, but that is clearly not the case here, as no fewer than three characters have stated that she should be more sexual, ignoring the fact that characterization of that type is far beyond Chris's capabilities. tl;dr: She isn't Asuka, she's just a pedo fap fantasy. --DStecks 20:42, 23 March 2010 (UTC)