Difference between revisions of "Talk:Emails"
(New page: ==To do== It's looking awesome - not now, but slowly. When it's done, it will be a fully annotated version of Chris's e-mails - in chronological order, with annotations so a total n00b cou...) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Could someone else help and check to see if everything's in order? I think a few of them might be out of order (that's my fault). But still, when it's done, this is going to be amazing. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 22:41, 15 March 2009 (CET) | Could someone else help and check to see if everything's in order? I think a few of them might be out of order (that's my fault). But still, when it's done, this is going to be amazing. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 22:41, 15 March 2009 (CET) | ||
==Da update== | |||
My God...it's beautiful. Not to brag, but for the first time, to my knowledge, the CWC e-mails are in chronological order and in plaintext format. Now to annotate these with blue links and we'll have an actual CWC cordance - you read the e-mails, not sure what something means? Guess what, click a blue link and it'll take you to the article. Also, time to add some images and whatnot to enforce it (like the fanarts that offended him, etc.). Anyways, so help me God, someone screws up (in a bad way) this page, I will go absolutely mad =D. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 03:13, 16 March 2009 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 21:13, 15 March 2009
To do
It's looking awesome - not now, but slowly. When it's done, it will be a fully annotated version of Chris's e-mails - in chronological order, with annotations so a total n00b could read these and understand everything.
Could someone else help and check to see if everything's in order? I think a few of them might be out of order (that's my fault). But still, when it's done, this is going to be amazing. --Champthom 22:41, 15 March 2009 (CET)
Da update
My God...it's beautiful. Not to brag, but for the first time, to my knowledge, the CWC e-mails are in chronological order and in plaintext format. Now to annotate these with blue links and we'll have an actual CWC cordance - you read the e-mails, not sure what something means? Guess what, click a blue link and it'll take you to the article. Also, time to add some images and whatnot to enforce it (like the fanarts that offended him, etc.). Anyways, so help me God, someone screws up (in a bad way) this page, I will go absolutely mad =D. --Champthom 03:13, 16 March 2009 (CET)