Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mailbag 60"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
:I'm willing to bet that more letters are added over time.  This has happened before.  Alternately, this could be an experiment to see if Chris gives better answers to just a few letters.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 11:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
:I'm willing to bet that more letters are added over time.  This has happened before.  Alternately, this could be an experiment to see if Chris gives better answers to just a few letters.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 11:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
::I'm willing to bet that it is to get Chris to respond at all. He's barely made a peep this last week. --[[User:OFSheep|OFSheep]] 12:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
::I'm willing to bet that it is to get Chris to respond at all. He's barely made a peep this last week. --[[User:OFSheep|OFSheep]] 12:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
:::It might be a subtle reference to him losing so many fans after the latest issue. If so, I like it. --[[User:Iroquois|Iroquois]] 21:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:49, 8 March 2010

Jesus, the mailbag gets shorter as they go, don't they? Amenta101 17:40, March 8 2010, Greenwich Mean Time (AUS)

I'm willing to bet that more letters are added over time. This has happened before. Alternately, this could be an experiment to see if Chris gives better answers to just a few letters.--Beat 11:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm willing to bet that it is to get Chris to respond at all. He's barely made a peep this last week. --OFSheep 12:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
It might be a subtle reference to him losing so many fans after the latest issue. If so, I like it. --Iroquois 21:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC)