Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mailbag 60"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::I'm willing to bet that it is to get Chris to respond at all. He's barely made a peep this last week. --[[User:OFSheep|OFSheep]] 12:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC) | ::I'm willing to bet that it is to get Chris to respond at all. He's barely made a peep this last week. --[[User:OFSheep|OFSheep]] 12:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::It might be a subtle reference to him losing so many fans after the latest issue. If so, I like it. --[[User:Iroquois|Iroquois]] 21:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC) | :::It might be a subtle reference to him losing so many fans after the latest issue. If so, I like it. --[[User:Iroquois|Iroquois]] 21:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::I wonder if he'll freak out when he realizes this. Of course, considering how astronomically dense he is, I doubt he will. --[[User:BreadGod|BreadGod]] 22:53, 8 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:53, 8 March 2010
Jesus, the mailbag gets shorter as they go, don't they? Amenta101 17:40, March 8 2010, Greenwich Mean Time (AUS)
- I'm willing to bet that more letters are added over time. This has happened before. Alternately, this could be an experiment to see if Chris gives better answers to just a few letters.--Beat 11:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm willing to bet that it is to get Chris to respond at all. He's barely made a peep this last week. --OFSheep 12:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC)