Difference between revisions of "Talk:Virginia is for Virgins"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: ==To do== *add Chris's fake ad for "Virginia is for Virgins" *I believe Chris commented somewhere how he get the idea from the "Virginia is for Lovers" campaign (well, it's obvious the ins...) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*add Chris's fake ad for "Virginia is for Virgins" | *add Chris's fake ad for "Virginia is for Virgins" | ||
*I believe Chris commented somewhere how he get the idea from the "Virginia is for Lovers" campaign (well, it's obvious the inspiration, but it's amusing that he explains it). I believe it was in a MySpace entry, maybe it's in [[Other]], I need to check or someone else can. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 14:37, 11 March 2009 (CET) | *I believe Chris commented somewhere how he get the idea from the "Virginia is for Lovers" campaign (well, it's obvious the inspiration, but it's amusing that he explains it). I believe it was in a MySpace entry, maybe it's in [[Other]], I need to check or someone else can. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 14:37, 11 March 2009 (CET) | ||
: Chris uses two forms of the phrase. The longer version is "Virginia is for Virgins; not Lovers," so the reference he's making is so obvious that even he probably doesn't think he needs to explain it. --[[User:MachPunch|MachPunch]] 00:39, 12 March 2009 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 18:39, 11 March 2009
To do
- add Chris's fake ad for "Virginia is for Virgins"
- I believe Chris commented somewhere how he get the idea from the "Virginia is for Lovers" campaign (well, it's obvious the inspiration, but it's amusing that he explains it). I believe it was in a MySpace entry, maybe it's in Other, I need to check or someone else can. --Champthom 14:37, 11 March 2009 (CET)
- Chris uses two forms of the phrase. The longer version is "Virginia is for Virgins; not Lovers," so the reference he's making is so obvious that even he probably doesn't think he needs to explain it. --MachPunch 00:39, 12 March 2009 (CET)