Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jackie"
m |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
So... why aren't "her" nudes here? [[User:DirtyCrappedBriefs|DirtyCrappedBriefs]] 19:36, 14 September 2010 (PDT) | So... why aren't "her" nudes here? [[User:DirtyCrappedBriefs|DirtyCrappedBriefs]] 19:36, 14 September 2010 (PDT) | ||
* Maybe because the retard sometimes checks cwcki, and if he were to find nudes of his latest sweetheart right there he might realise whats up | * Maybe because the retard sometimes checks cwcki, and if he were to find nudes of his latest sweetheart right there he might realise whats up <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mistermental|Mistermental]] ([[User talk:Mistermental|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mistermental|contribs]]) </span></small> | ||
: Well any nudes that people find are clearly not her. I don't think Chris would fall for the type of girl who has nudes circulating the internet. --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] | : Well any nudes that people find are clearly not her. I don't think Chris would fall for the type of girl who has nudes circulating the internet. --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] | ||
Revision as of 20:20, 16 September 2010
| Halt! This talk page is not a forum. |
This talk page is ONLY to discuss improvements to the article. If you choose to disregard this - you may be banned. There are other places to discuss Chris and this article's topic:
|
 on the edit box. |
tl;dr: This woman decided to contact us and wants to tell other women not to go out with chris. she doesn't know how the wiki shit works so just like...i'm handling it for now. so yeah. okay. Clydec 04:23, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
and apparently now she's back with chris for some reason. Clydec 14:35, 13 September 2010 (PDT)
- I'm assuming this is the same woman as in the Jackie e-mails, right? - Boop 15:24, 13 September 2010 (PDT)
- Probably. I'm still curious as to how CHRIS of all people bagged such a major fucking hottie. --Noel Ari Paige 06:07, 14 September 2010 (PDT)
- Troll perhaps? I'm still not sure how he could 'attract' a girl like this ... perhaps she has a hideous facial scar on the hidden side of her face? --MaHexBawx 07:57, 16 September 2010 (PDT)
- I get the feeling that it was less of her getting back with him and more of him deciding to try to get her back. --Arius 04:21, 15 September 2010 (PDT)
Wasn't the Jackie page deleted sometime ago between the 6th and now while we were trying to figure it out. Or am I forgetting the origonal name? --SerenityMoonstone 21:37, 13 September 2010.
I thought that listing the last name was a no-no after the Wallflower incident. Is this something that should be taken out or are we going to leave it up this time? --Caboose -1 19:10, 13 September 2010 (PDT)
You have to remember that The Wallflower herself requested to take her name down of the site - all the other names e.g. Megan Schroeder are still there --Maximilian Graves 19:14, 13 September 2010 (PDT)
I Have to ask, Who's behind this?--Dan Dash 12:26, 14 September 2010 (PDT)
- Behind what? 9/11? CrassCrab 12:34, 14 September 2010 (PDT)
- Jews did 9/13. --Sonijew is back 12:51, 14 September 2010 (PDT)
So... why aren't "her" nudes here? DirtyCrappedBriefs 19:36, 14 September 2010 (PDT)
- Maybe because the retard sometimes checks cwcki, and if he were to find nudes of his latest sweetheart right there he might realise whats up —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistermental (talk • contribs)
- Well any nudes that people find are clearly not her. I don't think Chris would fall for the type of girl who has nudes circulating the internet. --Anonymax