Difference between revisions of "User talk:Freecell"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (From the Sign template a few days ago. It was just in the wrong place.)
Line 39: Line 39:
I had already figured out how to do so.  Thanks
I had already figured out how to do so.  Thanks
--[[User:Miryag1|Diavna ----- diavna@gmail.com]] 14:07, 6 March 2011 (PST)
--[[User:Miryag1|Diavna ----- diavna@gmail.com]] 14:07, 6 March 2011 (PST)
== the beavis and butthead thing ==
Well I kinda understand that, but from what I've seen around the site, a lot of articles make, what can mostly just be called specualtion, about Chris' psyche, in regards to different situations and elements of his life. Just thought I was doing the same thing. --[[User:NeoShadow|NeoShadow]] 13:58, 18 April 2011 (PDT)

Revision as of 15:58, 18 April 2011

Talk Page Archives
CurrentArchive1

It's from there's something about mary, the fat retard who searches for his baseball in front of a high school. --Dankechu 03:58, 29 January 2011 (PST)

Fuck you --Dankechu 04:36, 30 January 2011 (PST)

wtf

you need to calm the fuck down and find something else to do with your time. CWCki - serious business. --Delabonte 02:32, 6 February 2011 (PST)

Hey buddy

You seem to really care a lot about banning people. Does this make you feel powerful? Does it give you a rush? Just wonderin'. RachmaninovDESU 05:54, 8 February 2011 (PST)

Just wonderin' but do you even LOOK at who he bans? It's usually for the best because it's normally someone who vandalized stuff or was being a totally jackass. Sorry if I'm butting into an issue I'm not suppose to be a part of, but this is just how I see it. --4Macie 06:20, 8 February 2011 (PST)
This is not about who he bans, it's more the spergy satisfaction he seems to get out of it. RachmaninovDESU 06:23, 8 February 2011 (PST)
Now, I'm not criticizing your work or anything, I know you do shit that no one else wants to do, but let me put it this way: your overall style comes over as banhappy. It might be that because I've only read certain posts by you my opinion is somehow colored, or something, but I guess having a 300 word text on your userpage about exactly who you're going to ban isn't helping for one. RachmaninovDESU 09:55, 8 February 2011 (PST)
To me you're still the Hitler of CwCki admins. Go enjoy your thousand year reich. RachmaninovDESU 10:40, 10 February 2011 (PST)
You and Megan should get together, so that you can spend more time on hanky panky and less time on BANNING PEOPLE! RachmaninovDESU 15:04, 10 February 2011 (PST)

Dudleystephen

This guy just joined and is advertising a workout product on his userpage. Just giving you a heads-up.--trombonista 21:21, 16 February 2011 (PST)

Well, that's somewhat embarrassing. I guess I need to learn not to do this when I just wake up. Thelieisacake 03:27, 17 February 2011 (PST)

Captions

Nice work on the captions, Abuelita finally got around to adding them. Keep up the good work.--Champthom 14:42, 17 February 2011 (PST)

Thanks. Freecell (t/c) 14:43, 17 February 2011 (PST)

thanks dude--CorinaLives 08:25, 23 February 2011 (PST)

the newly leaked Kacey call

The call I posted a transcript of is real, but I appreciate your doubts, it means you're doing your job. This is mainly here because I wanted to make sure that I had down the format. Way back when, this phone call (before Kacey and CWC first met) and another (after Kacey and CWC) were leaked on /cwc/. This was a long time ago and I was just waiting for them to leak so I wrote up the transcripts. To tell the truth, they both seem to be long lost someplace on my main computer, but luckily they're still on another one I use frequently. Its been far too long and I was looking for someone to help leak them on the wiki, that person is you I guess, because I'm not sure the best way to integrate these 2 calls. Sometime tomorrow I'll get the calls up on line and the transcript to the second call, if you want, you can move them where they need to go. FourPLUStwo 23:00, 28 February 2011 (PST)

Just a quick question

I noticed something. When I'm logged in the userbox subcategories are there, but when I'm not logged in there not there. Is there a reason for this? Its not a big deal, but I just want to make sure the subcategories are viewable to all users, and not just me.Theiselybros 13:17, 3 March 2011 (PST)

RE: Sign Posts

I had already figured out how to do so. Thanks --Diavna ----- diavna@gmail.com 14:07, 6 March 2011 (PST)

the beavis and butthead thing

Well I kinda understand that, but from what I've seen around the site, a lot of articles make, what can mostly just be called specualtion, about Chris' psyche, in regards to different situations and elements of his life. Just thought I was doing the same thing. --NeoShadow 13:58, 18 April 2011 (PDT)