User talk:Freecell

Talk Page Archives
Current ☀ Archive1

It's from there's something about mary, the fat retard who searches for his baseball in front of a high school. --Dankechu 03:58, 29 January 2011 (PST)

Fuck you --Dankechu 04:36, 30 January 2011 (PST)

wtf

you need to calm the fuck down and find something else to do with your time. CWCki - serious business. --Delabonte 02:32, 6 February 2011 (PST)

Hey buddy

You seem to really care a lot about banning people. Does this make you feel powerful? Does it give you a rush? Just wonderin'. RachmaninovDESU 05:54, 8 February 2011 (PST)

Just wonderin' but do you even LOOK at who he bans? It's usually for the best because it's normally someone who vandalized stuff or was being a totally jackass. Sorry if I'm butting into an issue I'm not suppose to be a part of, but this is just how I see it. --4Macie 06:20, 8 February 2011 (PST)

This is not about who he bans, it's more the spergy satisfaction he seems to get out of it. RachmaninovDESU 06:23, 8 February 2011 (PST)

Now, I'm not criticizing your work or anything, I know you do shit that no one else wants to do, but let me put it this way: your overall style comes over as banhappy. It might be that because I've only read certain posts by you my opinion is somehow colored, or something, but I guess having a 300 word text on your userpage about exactly who you're going to ban isn't helping for one. RachmaninovDESU 09:55, 8 February 2011 (PST)

To me you're still the Hitler of CwCki admins. Go enjoy your thousand year reich. RachmaninovDESU 10:40, 10 February 2011 (PST)

You and Megan should get together, so that you can spend more time on hanky panky and less time on BANNING PEOPLE! RachmaninovDESU 15:04, 10 February 2011 (PST)

Dudleystephen

This guy just joined and is advertising a workout product on his userpage. Just giving you a heads-up.--trombonista 21:21, 16 February 2011 (PST)

Well, that's somewhat embarrassing. I guess I need to learn not to do this when I just wake up. Thelieisacake 03:27, 17 February 2011 (PST)

Captions

Nice work on the captions, Abuelita finally got around to adding them. Keep up the good work.--Champthom 14:42, 17 February 2011 (PST)

Thanks. Freecell (t/c) 14:43, 17 February 2011 (PST)

thanks dude--CorinaLives 08:25, 23 February 2011 (PST)

the newly leaked Kacey call

The call I posted a transcript of is real, but I appreciate your doubts, it means you're doing your job. This is mainly here because I wanted to make sure that I had down the format. Way back when, this phone call (before Kacey and CWC first met) and another (after Kacey and CWC) were leaked on /cwc/. This was a long time ago and I was just waiting for them to leak so I wrote up the transcripts. To tell the truth, they both seem to be long lost someplace on my main computer, but luckily they're still on another one I use frequently. Its been far too long and I was looking for someone to help leak them on the wiki, that person is you I guess, because I'm not sure the best way to integrate these 2 calls. Sometime tomorrow I'll get the calls up on line and the transcript to the second call, if you want, you can move them where they need to go. FourPLUStwo 23:00, 28 February 2011 (PST)

Just a quick question

I noticed something. When I'm logged in the userbox subcategories are there, but when I'm not logged in there not there. Is there a reason for this? Its not a big deal, but I just want to make sure the subcategories are viewable to all users, and not just me.Theiselybros 13:17, 3 March 2011 (PST)

RE: Sign Posts

I had already figured out how to do so. Thanks --Diavna ----- diavna@gmail.com 14:07, 6 March 2011 (PST)

the beavis and butthead thing

Well I kinda understand that, but from what I've seen around the site, a lot of articles make, what can mostly just be called specualtion, about Chris' psyche, in regards to different situations and elements of his life. Just thought I was doing the same thing. --NeoShadow 13:58, 18 April 2011 (PDT)

• Well, maybe the CWCki should have like a template thing that says WARNING: This section contains heavy speculation that hasn't really been confirmed to be true or something like that. I mean, let's say Chris is really done. He finally crashed into slumber for the last time. Then what? I mean, if all the CWCki does is archive only the facts of what we know, then that's a goal that can be easily reached and then what? the CWCki stays unchanged until someone finally stops paying for the domain? Speculation on Chris and why he does the things he does is what drives the CWC community, so I doubt that eliminating speculation from the biggest CWC related site would be a good idea. Then again, I guess I could just write my own speculation things on pages under my own userpage. i dunno. just think about it. glad i could help. --NeoShadow 04:40, 19 April 2011 (PDT)

• The CWCki doesn't have a template like that because if we allowed unchecked speculation the servers wouldn't be able to handle the strain or something. Not to mention the article quality would drop. Putting speculation on your own userpage is a terrible idea and an excelent way to piss people off, by the way. That's how Offshore got started, people started sperging on their userpages and it gave the CWCki latency issues. There is a difference between sperging and offering acceptable speculation, look at what was left in the Beavis and Butthead article and use that as a good example.

• Not Trying to barge in, but I think the Speculation Warning would be a fantastic idea. --Ctahu 02:59, 19 April 2011 (PDT)