Difference between revisions of "Talk:2013"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
Who cares that the DSM-V is coming out, unless the APA is reclassifying high-function autism as something else? If that is the case, we should make a note of it. [[User:Giantgroundsloth|Giantgroundsloth]] 19:27, 20 January 2012 (PST)
Who cares that the DSM-V is coming out, unless the APA is reclassifying high-function autism as something else? If that is the case, we should make a note of it. [[User:Giantgroundsloth|Giantgroundsloth]] 19:27, 20 January 2012 (PST)
*I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)
*I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)
** Seriously though, this page is really unnecessary. The only two events listed are birthdays. Why should we not then create a page for 2014 (Chris turns 31, Barb turns 73) and for 2015 and for 2016 and so on ad infinitum? Why not just delete it? [[User:Giantgroundsloth|Giantgroundsloth]] 16:35, 22 January 2012 (PST)

Revision as of 19:35, 22 January 2012

why am important??

Who cares that the DSM-V is coming out, unless the APA is reclassifying high-function autism as something else? If that is the case, we should make a note of it. Giantgroundsloth 19:27, 20 January 2012 (PST)

  • I really don't see why this is relevant to Chris, it's interesting, and I understand that they're redefining Asperger syndrome but unless Chris mentions it, it really doesn't belong here. It comes off as filler. Seriously, we've got a year, we don't need an entire page to 2013 yet. Hell, Chris might die this year or go to prison or something, we might not even need a 2013 page. --Champthom 05:48, 21 January 2012 (PST)
    • Seriously though, this page is really unnecessary. The only two events listed are birthdays. Why should we not then create a page for 2014 (Chris turns 31, Barb turns 73) and for 2015 and for 2016 and so on ad infinitum? Why not just delete it? Giantgroundsloth 16:35, 22 January 2012 (PST)